Magnitude and Factors Associated with Refer Results of Newborn Hearing Screening at Academic Tertiary Level Hospital,

Haben Birhane Werkineh1, Uta Fröschl2, Wale Limeneh Gellaw3

  • 1Department of ENT, Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Hawassa, Ethiopia.

Insights

Newborn hearing screening identifies 15.5% of infants needing further evaluation. Factors like noise, vernix caseosa, and jaundice impact screening results, emphasizing the need for timely intervention in at-risk infants.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Audiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Hearing impairment is a major global disability.
  • Early identification and intervention of hearing loss are crucial for child development.
  • This study assessed newborn hearing screening outcomes at a tertiary hospital.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the prevalence of refer results in newborn hearing screening.
  • To identify factors associated with refer results in newborn hearing screening.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a two-stage screening protocol.

Main Methods:

  • An institution-based time series cross-sectional study included 368 newborns.
  • A two-stage screening protocol used Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission (TEOAE) and Auditory Brainstem Reflex (ABR).
  • Data were analyzed using binary logistic regression (P<0.05).

Main Results:

  • The initial TEOAE screening showed a 38% refer rate.
  • After follow-up, 15.5% of newborns ultimately had refer results.
  • Noise, vernix caseosa, very low birth weight, and neonatal jaundice were associated with refer results.

Conclusions:

  • 15.5% of newborns require diagnostic audiologic work-up and potential intervention.
  • Avoidable factors like noise and vernix caseosa were identified.
  • Newborns with jaundice and very low birth weight need prompt ENT screening.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos