Only transesophageal echocardiography guided patent foramen ovale closure: A single-center experience

Su Wang1, Ge Zhu1, Zhang Liu1

  • 1Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Frontiers in Surgery
|October 28, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance for patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is safe and effective, offering higher success rates and shorter procedure times compared to angiographic guidance. This method may reduce recurrent stroke incidence.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Neurology
  • Interventional Radiology

Background:

  • Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with recurrent stroke in certain patient populations.
  • PFO occlusion is a therapeutic option to reduce stroke recurrence, but optimal guidance techniques require further investigation.
  • Comparing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and angiographic guidance for PFO closure is crucial for procedural optimization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of TEE guidance versus angiographic guidance for PFO closure.
  • To evaluate procedural success rates, duration, complications, and long-term outcomes including residual shunt and recurrent cerebral ischemia.
  • To determine if TEE-guided PFO closure can be performed without fluoroscopy and contrast media.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study of 120 patients undergoing PFO closure between April 2019 and March 2021.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: TEE guidance (65 patients) and angiographic guidance (55 patients).
  • Key outcomes included procedural success, time, complications, and 12-month follow-up for atrial fibrillation, residual shunt, and recurrent cerebral ischemia.

Main Results:

  • TEE guidance demonstrated a significantly higher procedural success rate (100% vs. 92.7%, P=0.028) and shorter procedural time (23.15±13.87 vs. 25.75±7.19 min, P=0.001).
  • No significant differences were observed in procedural complication rates, new-onset atrial fibrillation, residual shunt, or recurrent cerebral ischemia at 12 months between the groups.
  • Specifically, residual shunt occurred in 1.5% of the TEE group versus 5.5% of the angiographic group (P=0.236).

Conclusions:

  • Intra-procedural TEE guidance for PFO closure is a safe and effective technique.
  • TEE guidance offers advantages in procedural success and efficiency, potentially without increasing complications or adverse events.
  • The study supports the feasibility of TEE-guided PFO closure without fluoroscopy or contrast media, with satisfactory short- and medium-term outcomes.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos