Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Only transesophageal echocardiography guided patent foramen ovale closure: A single-center experience
1Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Insights
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance for patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is safe and effective, offering higher success rates and shorter procedure times compared to angiographic guidance. This method may reduce recurrent stroke incidence.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with recurrent stroke in certain patient populations.
- PFO occlusion is a therapeutic option to reduce stroke recurrence, but optimal guidance techniques require further investigation.
- Comparing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and angiographic guidance for PFO closure is crucial for procedural optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of TEE guidance versus angiographic guidance for PFO closure.
- To evaluate procedural success rates, duration, complications, and long-term outcomes including residual shunt and recurrent cerebral ischemia.
- To determine if TEE-guided PFO closure can be performed without fluoroscopy and contrast media.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 120 patients undergoing PFO closure between April 2019 and March 2021.
- Patients were divided into two groups: TEE guidance (65 patients) and angiographic guidance (55 patients).
- Key outcomes included procedural success, time, complications, and 12-month follow-up for atrial fibrillation, residual shunt, and recurrent cerebral ischemia.
Main Results:
- TEE guidance demonstrated a significantly higher procedural success rate (100% vs. 92.7%, P=0.028) and shorter procedural time (23.15±13.87 vs. 25.75±7.19 min, P=0.001).
- No significant differences were observed in procedural complication rates, new-onset atrial fibrillation, residual shunt, or recurrent cerebral ischemia at 12 months between the groups.
- Specifically, residual shunt occurred in 1.5% of the TEE group versus 5.5% of the angiographic group (P=0.236).
Conclusions:
- Intra-procedural TEE guidance for PFO closure is a safe and effective technique.
- TEE guidance offers advantages in procedural success and efficiency, potentially without increasing complications or adverse events.
- The study supports the feasibility of TEE-guided PFO closure without fluoroscopy or contrast media, with satisfactory short- and medium-term outcomes.
Background:
An increasing number of studies have proved that patent foramen ovale (PFO) occlusion could reduce the incidence of recurrent stroke more than drug therapy alone under certain conditions. Which is the "best" guidance technique still remains to be discussed.
Methods:
A single center retrospective study enrolled 120 patients (mean age 52.51 ± 14.29 years) who underwent PFO closure between April 2019 and March 2021. 87 patients (72.5%) had suffered cryptogenic stroke (CS) at least one time, and 24 patients (20%) had repetitive episodes of hemicrania unsourced. 65 patients were in the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance group (T-group), and the other 55 patients were in the angiographic guidance group (A-group).
Results:
There were no significant differences in crucial clinical characteristics between the two groups. In T-group, the procedural success rate was higher (100% vs. 92.7%, P = 0.028), and the procedural time was shorter (23.15 ± 13.87 vs. 25.75 ± 7.19, P = 0.001). No difference was detected in the procedural complication rate. Follow-up were performed at least 12 months. At 12 months, new atrial fibrillation occurred in 1 patient (1.5%) in the T-group and in 1 patient (1.8%) in the A-group (P = 0.905). Residual shunt occurred in 1 patient (1.5%) in the T-group and in 3 patients (5.5%) in the A-group (P = 0.236). Recurrent cerebral ischemia occurred in 2 patient (3.1%) in the T-group and in 2 patients (3.6%) in the A-group (P = 0.865).
Conclusion:
The use of only intra-procedural TEE guidance for PFO closure is safe and effective. The whole procedure can be performed without fluoroscopy and contrast medium. The short and medium follow-up results are satisfactory, especially in the residual shunt.
More Related Videos
07:41Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure
Published on: February 8, 2022
08:00Reduction of Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defects with an Anterior and Inferior Transseptal Puncture Site when Operating the Cryoballoon Ablation Catheter
Published on: June 15, 2015