Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Five-years' prognostic analysis for coronary artery ectasia patients with coronary atherosclerosis: A retrospective
Ruifeng Liu1, Xiangyu Gao1, Siwen Liang1
1Department of Cardiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Insights
Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have a worse prognosis. CAE patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) also face poorer outcomes. Medications like antiplatelets and ACEI/ARBs aid CAE + AMI patients, while managing stenosis is key for CAE patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Research
- Clinical Prognosis Studies
Background:
- Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) frequently coexists with coronary atherosclerosis.
- Limited prognostic data exists for CAE patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the overall prognosis for patients with coronary artery ectasia (CAE).
- To compare outcomes for CAE patients with comorbid acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and coronary heart disease (CHD) against relevant control groups.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study design.
- Inclusion of 51 CAE + AMI patients and 108 CAE + CHD patients.
- Propensity score matching used to create control groups: 153 AMI patients, 324 CHD patients, and 329 normal coronary artery participants (CON).
- Follow-up to observe major cardiovascular events (MACE).
Main Results:
- CAE + AMI patients exhibited a significantly worse prognosis than AMI patients (5-year non-MACE rate: 62.70% vs. 79.70%, P=0.010).
- CAE patients showed a worse prognosis compared to CHD and CON groups (5-year non-MACE rate: 74.10% vs. 85.80% and 96.70%, P=0.000).
- Key MACEs included AMI reoccurrence in CAE + AMI and re-hospitalization for angina in CAE. Antiplatelet agents and ACEI/ARBs were protective in CAE + AMI, while coronary stenosis degree (Gensini score) promoted MACE in CAE.
Conclusions:
- Prognosis is worse for CAE patients with AMI and for CAE patients with CHD compared to their respective controls.
- CAE + AMI patients are prone to AMI reoccurrence; CAE patients are prone to repeated angina pectoris.
- Treatment strategies should include antiplatelets and ACEI/ARBs for CAE + AMI, and focus on preventing atherosclerotic lesion progression for CAE patients.
Background:
Most of coronary artery ectasia (CAE) patients have comorbid coronary atherosclerosis. It was lack of prognostic data for CAE patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and for whom with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Objective:
To determine the overall prognosis for CAE patients.
Materials And Methods:
This study was a retrospective cohort study. Fifty-one patients with CAE and comorbid AMI (CAE + AMI) and 108 patients with CAE and comorbid CHD (CAE + CHD) were enrolled and matched to non-CAE subjects at a ratio of 1:3 using a propensity score method, respectively. Controls for CAE + AMI group were 153 AMI patients, controls for CAE group were 324 CHD patients and 329 participants with relatively normal coronary arteries (CON). We followed them up to observe major cardiovascular events (MACE).
Results:
The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the prognosis in CAE + AMI group was worse than in AMI group (5-year non-MACE rate: 62.70% vs. 79.70%, P = 0.010), the prognosis in CAE group was worse than in CHD and CON groups (5-year non-MACE rate: 74.10% vs. 85.80% and 96.70%, respectively, P = 0.000). The main MACEs in CAE + AMI and CAE groups were AMI reoccurrence (19.61% vs. 4.57%, P = 0.002) and re-hospitalization due to repeated angina pectoris (14.81% vs. 8.33% and 2.74%, P = 0.000), respectively. Additionally, the COX regression analysis revealed that the protective factors for preventing MACE in CAE + AMI group included antiplatelet agents (hazard ratio = 0.234, P = 0.016) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor inhibitor (ACEI/ARB, hazard ratio = 0.317, P = 0.037). Whereas the main factor promoting MACE in CAE group was the degree of coronary stenosis (Gensini score, hazard ratio = 1.011, P = 0.022).
Conclusion:
The prognosis of patients with CAE + AMI was worse than that of those with AMI. The overall prognosis of patients with CAE was worse than that of those with CHD. CAE + AMI and CAE groups had different characteristics; the former was prone to AMI reoccurrence, and the latter was prone to repeated angina pectoris. To prevent MACE, medications, including antiplatelets and ACEI/ARBs, are indicated for patients with CAE + AMI, whereas prevention of the progression of atherosclerotic lesions is indicated for patients with CAE.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology

