Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Automatic quantitative measurement of left atrial pressure using mitral regurgitation spectrum: clinical study on
Yan Jin1, Chao-Yang Wen2, Fengjie Yue3
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, No. 83, Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, 110016, Liaoning, China.
Introduction:
To explore how to measure LAPEq accurately and quantitatively, that is, the left atrial pressure (LAP) measured and calculated by equation method using mitral regurgitation spectrum.
Methods:
The mitral regurgitation spectrum, pulmonary arteriolar wedge pressure (PAWP) and invasive arterial systolic pressure of radial artery of 28 patients were collected simultaneously, including 3 patients with rheumatic heart disease, 15 patients with mitral valve prolapse and 10 patients with coronary artery bypass grafting, patients with moderate or above aortic stenosis were excluded. LAPBp (Doppler sphygmomanometer method), LAPEq (Equation method) and LAPC (Catheter method) were measured synchronously, and the measurement results of the three methods were compared and analyzed. A special intelligent Doppler spectrum analysis software was self-designed to accurately measure LAPEq. This study had been approved by the ethics committee of the Northern Theater General Hospital (K-2019-17), and applied for clinical trial (No. Chictr 190023812).
Results:
It was found that there was no significant statistical difference between the measurement results of LAPC and LAPEq (t = 0.954, P = 0.348), and significant correlation between the two methods [r = 0.908(0.844, 0.964), P < 0.001]. Although the measurement results of LAPC and LAPBP are consistent in the condition of non-severe eccentric mitral regurgitation, there are significant differences in the overall case and weak correlation between the two methods [r = 0.210, (-0.101, 0.510), P = 0.090]. In MVP patients with P1 or P3 prolapse, the peak pressure difference of MR was underestimated due to the serious eccentricity of MR, which affected the accuracy of LAPBP measurement.
Conclusions:
It was shown that there is a good correlation between LAPEq and LAPC, which verifies that the non-invasive and direct quantitative measurement of left atrial pressure based on mitral regurgitation spectrum is feasible and has a good application prospect.
More Related Videos
08:17Murine Echocardiography of Left Atrium, Aorta, and Pulmonary Artery
Published on: February 20, 2017
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management