Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

05:44
Author Spotlight: Utilizing Venoplasty Balloon Model in Rodents to Simulate Surgical Interventions for Deep Veins
Published on: May 24, 2024
713
Performance evaluation of biodegradable polymer sirolimus and ascorbic acid eluting stent systems.
Won-Il Jo1, Ji-Hyun Youn1, So-Young Kang1
1CG Bio Co. Ltd, Seoul, Korea.
Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine
|October 29, 2022
Summary
This study compared four drug-eluting stents (DES), finding D+Storm® DES superior in foreshortening and recoil. A clinical trial confirmed D+Storm® DES safety with no major adverse cardiovascular events in 201 patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Biomaterials Science
- Medical Device Engineering
Background:
- Drug-eluting stents (DES) are crucial in treating coronary artery disease.
- Biodegradable polymer stents offer potential advantages over traditional metallic stents.
- Evaluating mechanical properties and clinical safety is essential for new DES technologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of biodegradable polymer sirolimus and ascorbic acid eluting stent systems against four commercially available drug-eluting stents (DES).
- To characterize mechanical properties including dimension, foreshortening, recoil, radial force, and trackability.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel DES through registry experiments.
Main Methods:
- Mechanical testing was performed to evaluate dimensions, foreshortening, recoil, radial force, crossing profile, folding shape, trackability, and dislodgement force.
- A post-marketing clinical study was conducted in real-world settings.
- Registry data from 201 patients with 1-month follow-up were analyzed for safety outcomes.
Main Results:
- D+Storm® DES demonstrated superior performance with 1.3% foreshortening and 3.70% recoil compared to other tested DES.
- The ongoing clinical study of D+Storm® DES enrolled 201 patients, with no major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) reported after 1-month follow-up.
- Initial findings suggest D+Storm® DES is safe in a clinical setting, with further assessment planned for 300 patients.
Conclusions:
- Objective evaluation and comparison of mechanical responses of four commercially available DES were reported.
- While mechanical features showed minor differences, understanding these can aid in selecting the most suitable stent for specific clinical situations.
- The D+Storm® DES exhibits promising safety and performance, warranting continued clinical evaluation.

