Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
Surface Roughness of Prefabricated Pediatric Zirconia Crowns Following Simulated Toothbrushing
Bryan W Shin1, Martin Donaldson2, Brian R Morrow3
1Mr. Shin is a fourth-year dental student, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tenn., USA;,
This study evaluated pediatric zirconia crowns (ZRCs) and found minimal surface roughness changes after simulated brushing with various toothpastes. These findings support the use of ZRCs as a durable pediatric dental restoration.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Pediatric Dentistry
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Prefabricated pediatric zirconia crowns (ZRCs) are an increasingly common restorative option for children.
- Understanding the long-term durability and surface integrity of ZRCs under daily use conditions, such as toothbrushing with different dentifrices, is crucial for clinical application.
- Surface roughness can impact plaque accumulation, aesthetics, and the longevity of dental restorations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of simulated toothbrushing with various dentifrices on the surface roughness of three distinct brands of prefabricated pediatric zirconia crowns (ZRCs).
- To compare the surface roughness changes (Ra and Rz) across different ZRC brands and dentifrice formulations.
Main Methods:
- Ninety-six pediatric ZRCs from Kinder Krowns®, NuSmile®, and Sprig® were subjected to 10,000 simulated toothbrushing strokes.
- ZRCs were paired with four different dentifrices exhibiting varying Relative Dentin Abrasion (RDA) values: Tom's of Maine Children's, Crest Kid's, Prevident 5000, and Crest® Pro-Health.
- Surface roughness was measured using a stylus profilometer before and after brushing; data were analyzed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA.
Main Results:
- Statistically significant differences in surface roughness were observed between baseline and post-brushing measurements for specific ZRC brands and dentifrice combinations (e.g., Kinder Krowns® with Prevident, Sprig® with Crest Kid's).
- Differences in roughness changes were noted when comparing Sprig® and NuSmile® ZRCs with Crest Kid's dentifrice.
- NuSmile® ZRCs showed distinct baseline and post-brushing roughness values compared to both Sprig® and Kinder® ZRCs across all tested dentifrices.
Conclusions:
- While statistically significant differences in surface roughness were detected, the actual changes were minimal in scale.
- The study provides preliminary confidence for clinicians regarding the use of prefabricated pediatric ZRCs as a sustainable restorative option.
- Further research is recommended to investigate the effects of toothbrushing and various dentifrices on the mechanical properties, durability, and retention of ZRCs.
More Related Videos
03:02Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Tooth Anatomy
The Crown, Neck, and Root
The visible part of the tooth is referred to as the crown. It's covered by enamel, the hardest substance in the human body. The crown is uniquely shaped for each type of tooth, allowing for different functions such as cutting, tearing, or...
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.