Rejoinder to "Instrumented difference-in-differences"
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
Ting Ye1, Ashkan Ertefaie2, James Flory3
1Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract:
We thank all the discussants for the careful reading and insightful comments. In our rejoinder, we extend the discussion of how the assumptions of instrumented difference-in-differences (iDID) compare to the assumptions of the standard instrumental variable method. We also make additional comments on how iDID is related to the fuzzy DID. We highlight future research directions to enhance the utility of iDID, including extensions to adjust for covariate shift in two-sample iDID design, and generalization of iDID to multiple time points and a multi-valued instrumental variable for DID.
Related Concept Videos
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
One-Way ANOVA
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

