Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Intertemporal choice reflects value comparison rather than self-control: insights from confidence judgements
Adam Bulley1,2, Karolina M Lempert3, Colin Conwell2
1The University of Sydney School of Psychology and Brain and Mind Centre, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Confidence in intertemporal choices reflects decision uncertainty, not self-control success. People are more confident when reward values are clearer, challenging traditional self-control theories of decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroeconomics
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Intertemporal decision-making is often viewed as a measure of self-control, where choosing immediate rewards signifies failure to resist temptation.
- Existing theories posit higher confidence in decisions involving delayed gratification, assuming successful self-control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between confidence and intertemporal choice, specifically challenging the self-control account.
- To determine factors influencing confidence in decisions involving future rewards.
Main Methods:
- Two pre-registered experiments with adult participants (n=117) involving monetary intertemporal choices.
- Participants rated their confidence in decisions and their separate valuations of potential rewards.
Main Results:
- Confidence was not higher for delayed rewards; instead, it correlated with temporal discounting, reward proximity, and magnitude.
- Higher confidence aligned with decisions matching separate reward valuations, indicating metacognitive insight.
- Less confident decisions were more variable and susceptible to manipulation.
Conclusions:
- Confidence in intertemporal choice reflects uncertainty in value estimation and comparison, similar to non-self-control decisions.
- Findings challenge self-control perspectives, reframing intertemporal choice as value-based decision-making about future possibilities.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Hindsight Biases
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

