Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Impact of Mandibular Angle Osteotomy Using a Geometric Mathematical Design on the Aesthetic Osteotomy Line: A
Antong Du1, Neng Ding1, Jian Zhang2
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changzheng Hospital), Ward Building 18th Floor, 415 Fengyang Road, Huangpu, Shanghai, 200003, China.
Background:
Mandibular angle osteotomy (MAO) is a frequently described technique in Eastern females. The success hinges on the precise positioning of the osteotomy line. The geometric mathematical method is viable. Therefore, we explored the impact of mandibular angle osteotomy using aesthetic standards and printed digital osteotomy templates (DOTs) on the aesthetic osteotomy line.
Methods:
This retrospective observational study included female patients with prominent mandibular angle (PMA) who underwent MAO at our hospital between January 2020 and March 2021. Thirty-three female patients were included, 22 in the DOTs group using new DOTs, and 11 in the traditional group using traditional free-hand techniques.
Results:
Regarding the width of the excised bone, the postoperative deviation from the preoperative plan was not significant in the DOTs group (0.5 ± 0.3 mm, P > 0.05), while the deviation was significant for the traditional group (2.5 ± 1.2 mm, P<0.05). The preparation time was longer in the DOTs group than in the traditional group (82 ± 11 vs. 53±4 min, P < 0.001). The osteotomy time and the operation time were shorter in the DOTs group than in the traditional group (osteotomy: 54 ± 5 vs. 73 ± 6 min; preparation: 124 ± 10 vs. 169 ± 13 min; both P < 0.001). The Likert (4.0 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.6, P = 0.006) and FACE-Q scores (17.5 ± 1.7 vs. 15.6 ± 1.3, P = 0.029) were higher in the DOTs group.
Conclusions:
The new method of positioning the new aesthetic osteotomy line based on geometric analysis might provide a possible osteotomy method that strongly suggests effectiveness, safety, individualization, and accuracy, with a shorter operation and higher patient satisfaction.
Level Of Evidence Iv:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
