Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nuclear Binding Energy02:13

Nuclear Binding Energy

12.9K
The difference between the calculated and experimentally measured masses is known as the mass defect of the atom. In the case of helium-4, the mass defect indicates a “loss” in mass of 4.0331 amu – 4.0026 amu = 0.0305 amu. The loss in mass accompanying the formation of an atom from protons, neutrons, and electrons is due to the conversion of that mass into energy that is evolved as the atom forms. The nuclear binding energy is the energy produced when the atoms’ nucleons...
12.9K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

13.2K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
13.2K
Bond Energies and Bond Lengths02:49

Bond Energies and Bond Lengths

25.6K
Stable molecules exist because covalent bonds hold the atoms together. The strength of a covalent bond is measured by the energy required to break it, that is, the energy necessary to separate the bonded atoms. Separating any pair of bonded atoms requires energy — the stronger a bond, the greater the energy required to break it.
25.6K
Bond Dissociation Energy and Activation Energy02:13

Bond Dissociation Energy and Activation Energy

9.2K
Bond energy is the energy required to break a bond homolytically. These values are usually expressed in units of kcal/mol or kJ/mol and are referred to as bond dissociation energies when given for specific bonds or average bond energies when indicated for a given type of bond over many compounds. Firstly, the bond dissociation energy for a single bond is weaker than that of a double bond, which in turn is weaker than that of a triple bond. Secondly, hydrogen forms relatively strong bonds with...
9.2K
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes02:49

Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes

21.7K
The free energy change for a reaction that occurs under the standard conditions of 1 bar pressure and at 298 K is called the standard free energy change. Since free energy is a state function, its value depends only on the conditions of the initial and final states of the system. A convenient and common approach to the calculation of free energy changes for physical and chemical reactions is by use of widely available compilations of standard state thermodynamic data. One method involves the...
21.7K
Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States03:25

Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States

11.6K
The free energy change for a process taking place with reactants and products present under nonstandard conditions (pressures other than 1 bar; concentrations other than 1 M) is related to the standard free energy change according to this equation:
 
where R is the gas constant (8.314 J/K·mol), T is the absolute temperature in kelvin, and Q is the reaction quotient. This equation may be used to predict the spontaneity of a process under any given set of conditions.
Reaction Quotient...
11.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Low-Scaling Many-Body Green's Function Calculations for Molecular Systems via Interacting-Bath Dynamical Embedding Theory.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Fractional charge density functional theory elucidates electro-inductive and electric field effects at electrochemical interfaces.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Velocity gauge for oscillator strength in ΔSCF theory.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Eliminating delocalization error through localized orbital scaling correction with orbital relaxation from linear response.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

LibppRPA: An open-source library for particle-particle random phase approximation.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

In Situ Insights into Enhanced Cooperative Ligand Exchange Kinetics via Solvent-Induced Restacking in a 2D Metal-Organic Framework.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.3K

Benchmark of GW Methods for Core-Level Binding Energies.

Jiachen Li1, Ye Jin1, Patrick Rinke2

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina27708, United States.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|November 2, 2022
PubMed
Summary

The GW approximation accurately computes core-level binding energies. Three methods—partial eigenvalue self-consistency, optimized hybrid functional, and Hedin shift—show superior performance for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.

More Related Videos

Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry
16:11

Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 8, 2022

2.4K
Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
08:54

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid

Published on: January 25, 2020

5.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.3K
Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry
16:11

Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 8, 2022

2.4K
Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
08:54

Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid

Published on: January 25, 2020

5.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Quantum mechanics
  • Spectroscopy

Background:

  • The GW approximation is a powerful tool for electronic structure calculations.
  • Accurate computation of core-level binding energies is crucial for interpreting X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data.
  • Existing GW methods require careful benchmarking for molecular systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively benchmark various GW methodologies for molecular inner-shell excitations.
  • To identify the most accurate GW schemes for calculating absolute and relative core-level binding energies.
  • To evaluate the performance of GW methods on the CORE65 benchmark set and ethyl trifluoroacetate.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation and comparison of different GW approximation schemes: starting point optimized, partial and full eigenvalue-self-consistent, Hedin shift, and renormalized singles.
  • Application of these methods to molecular inner-shell excitations.
  • Validation against experimental XPS data and the CORE65 benchmark set.

Main Results:

  • All tested GW methods consistently yield a unique solution for core-level energies.
  • Partial eigenvalue self-consistency, single-shot GW with optimized hybrid functionals, and the Hedin shift demonstrate superior accuracy for absolute core-level energies (MAE of 0.3 eV).
  • Eigenvalue self-consistent schemes and the Hedin shift achieve the highest accuracy for relative binding energies (MAE < 0.2 eV).

Conclusions:

  • Partial eigenvalue self-consistency, optimized hybrid functional starting points, and the Hedin shift are recommended GW schemes for accurate core-level binding energy calculations.
  • These methods provide reliable predictions for XPS interpretation in molecular systems.
  • The study establishes a benchmark for evaluating GW methodologies in this domain.