Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

98
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
98
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models01:15

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models

96
Physiological models in pharmacokinetics are instrumental in understanding the distribution and elimination of drugs within the body. These models describe the drug concentration within target organs, influenced by factors such as drug uptake, tissue volume, and blood flow. Drug uptake is governed by the partition coefficient, which signifies the drug concentration ratio in tissue to that in the blood. The blood flow rate to a specific tissue is expressed as Qt, and the rate of change in tissue...
96
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

118
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
118
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

79
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
79
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models01:21

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

142
Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...
142
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models01:14

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models

173
Compartmental analysis is a widely adopted approach to characterizing drug pharmacokinetics. It uses compartment models that conceptualize the body as a collection of reversibly communicating compartments, each representing a group of tissues exhibiting similar drug distribution characteristics. The movement rate of the drug between these compartments is typically described by first-order kinetics.
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
173

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

VizCOM: A Novel Tool for Advanced Visualization and Analysis of Cardiac Optical Mapping Data.

Computing in cardiology·2026
Same author

Deep Learning for analyzing chaotic dynamics in biological time series: Insights from frog heart signals.

Neurocomputing·2026
Same author

Fast Parameterization of Human Ventricular Ionic Models Using CardioFit.

Computing in cardiology·2026
Same author

Correction: Gradient vortex dynamics in 3D-weak turbulence.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Gradient vortex dynamics in 3D-weak turbulence.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Predicting complex time series with deep echo state networks.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations
12:09

Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations

Published on: January 8, 2013

13.8K

Bayesian inference for fitting cardiac models to experiments: estimating parameter distributions using Hamiltonian

Alejandro Nieto Ramos1,2, Flavio H Fenton3, Elizabeth M Cherry4

  • 1School of Mathematical Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, 1 Lomb Memorial Drive, 14623, Rochester, NY, USA.

Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
|November 2, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Two Bayesian methods, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) and approximate Bayesian computation sequential Monte Carlo (ABC-SMC), efficiently customize cardiac action potential models. Both methods successfully identify parameter distributions, offering improved patient-specific modeling capabilities.

Keywords:
AlternansCardiac action potentialFenton-Karma modelMitchell-Schaeffer modelStatistical computing

More Related Videos

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
09:20

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Published on: February 13, 2021

6.6K
In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
09:09

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations
12:09

Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations

Published on: January 8, 2013

13.8K
Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
09:20

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Published on: February 13, 2021

6.6K
In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
09:09

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

1.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Biophysics
  • Cardiovascular research

Background:

  • Patient-specific cardiac action potential models are crucial for predictive tools.
  • Traditional optimization methods struggle with noisy data, yielding single parameter fits.
  • Existing Bayesian methods like Markov chain Monte Carlo are computationally inefficient.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate two computationally efficient Bayesian approaches, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) and approximate Bayesian computation sequential Monte Carlo (ABC-SMC).
  • To assess the effectiveness of HMC and ABC-SMC in customizing cardiac action potential models using synthetic and experimental data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) algorithm for parameter estimation.
  • Employed approximate Bayesian computation sequential Monte Carlo (ABC-SMC) algorithm for parameter estimation.
  • Applied both methods to two cardiac action potential models with synthetic and zebrafish experimental data.

Main Results:

  • Both HMC and ABC-SMC successfully identified distributions of model parameters for cardiac action potential models.
  • HMC generally produced narrower marginal distributions compared to ABC-SMC.
  • ABC-SMC demonstrated less sensitivity to algorithmic settings, including prior distributions.

Conclusions:

  • HMC and ABC-SMC are computationally efficient and effective Bayesian methods for customizing cardiac action potential models.
  • These methods enable the development of more accurate patient-specific models and virtual patient cohorts.
  • The choice between HMC and ABC-SMC may depend on specific data characteristics and desired precision.