Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Folding01:22

Protein Folding

119.1K
Overview
119.1K
Molecular Models02:00

Molecular Models

39.8K
Physical models representing molecular architectures of chemical compounds play essential roles in understanding chemistry. The use of molecular models makes it easier to visualize the structures and shapes of atoms and molecules.
39.8K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

98
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
98

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Privateer for UCSF ChimeraX: Carbohydrate structure validation and visualization.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2026
Same author

Allosteric disordering of eIF2B regulates the integrated stress response.

Nature chemical biology·2026
Same authorSame journal

Scotty: lattice coincidences for macromolecular crystallographic phasing.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2026
Same author

AlphaFold as a prior: experimental structure determination conditioned on a pretrained neural network.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

The Untangle Challenge for accurate ensemble models.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Complete structures of the YenTc holotoxin prepore and pore reveal the evolutionary basis for chitinase incorporation into ABC toxins.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 23, 2025

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.8K

Putting AlphaFold models to work with phenix.process_predicted_model and ISOLDE.

Robert D Oeffner1, Tristan I Croll1, Claudia Millán1

  • 1Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, The Keith Peters Building, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, United Kingdom.

Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Structural Biology
|November 2, 2022
PubMed
Summary

AlphaFold provides accurate protein models but requires refinement. New tools use AlphaFold

Keywords:
AlphaFoldISOLDEPhenixconfidence measuresprocess_predicted_model

More Related Videos

Production, Crystallization and Structure Determination of C. difficile PPEP-1 via Microseeding and Zinc-SAD
13:34

Production, Crystallization and Structure Determination of C. difficile PPEP-1 via Microseeding and Zinc-SAD

Published on: December 30, 2016

11.6K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

277

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 23, 2025

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.8K
Production, Crystallization and Structure Determination of C. difficile PPEP-1 via Microseeding and Zinc-SAD
13:34

Production, Crystallization and Structure Determination of C. difficile PPEP-1 via Microseeding and Zinc-SAD

Published on: December 30, 2016

11.6K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

277

Area of Science:

  • Structural biology
  • Computational biology
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • AlphaFold is a powerful AI tool for predicting protein structures.
  • Predicted models often achieve high accuracy but can contain local errors.
  • Confidence metrics from AlphaFold are crucial for assessing model reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe methods for refining AlphaFold models using confidence metrics.
  • To integrate AlphaFold predictions into experimental structure determination workflows.
  • To reduce manual rebuilding efforts in structural biology.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing AlphaFold's predicted local distance difference test (pLDDT) scores.
  • Employing the predicted aligned error (PAE) matrix for domain orientation confidence.
  • Applying the phenix.process_predicted_model tool to filter low-confidence regions.
  • Using ISOLDE for interactive refinement guided by confidence metrics and experimental data.

Main Results:

  • Downweighting or removing low-confidence residues improves model quality.
  • Breaking models into confidently predicted domains facilitates molecular replacement and cryo-EM docking.
  • Interactive refinement in ISOLDE effectively adjusts AlphaFold models to fit experimental data.
  • Reduced need for extensive manual rebuilding of protein structures.

Conclusions:

  • Confidence metrics from AlphaFold are essential for reliable structure determination.
  • Integrated computational and experimental approaches enhance structural biology workflows.
  • These methods streamline the process of obtaining accurate protein structures from predictions.