Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Detection of Antibodies That Neutralize the Cellular Uptake of Enzyme Replacement Therapies with a Cell-based Assay
Published on: September 10, 2018
How I diagnose and treat atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome
Fadi Fakhouri1, Nora Schwotzer1, Véronique Frémeaux-Bacchi2
1Department of Medicine, Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Our understanding and management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) have dramatically improved in the last decade. aHUS has been established as a prototypic disease resulting from a dysregulation of the complement alternative C3 convertase. Subsequently, prospective nonrandomized studies and retrospective series have shown the efficacy of C5 blockade in the treatment of this devastating disease. C5 blockade has become the cornerstone of the treatment of aHUS. This therapeutic breakthrough has been dulled by persistent difficulties in the positive diagnosis of aHUS, and the latter remains, to date, a diagnosis by exclusion. Furthermore, the precise spectrum of complement-mediated renal thrombotic microangiopathy is still a matter of debate. Nevertheless, long-term management of aHUS is increasingly individualized and lifelong C5 blockade is no longer a paradigm that applies to all patients with this disease. The potential benefit of complement blockade in other forms of HUS, notably secondary HUS, remains uncertain.
Our understanding and management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) have dramatically improved in the last decade. aHUS has been established as a prototypic disease resulting from a dysregulation of the complement alternative C3 convertase. Subsequently, prospective nonrandomized studies and retrospective series have shown the efficacy of C5 blockade in the treatment of this devastating disease. C5 blockade has become the cornerstone of the treatment of aHUS. This therapeutic breakthrough has been dulled by persistent difficulties in the positive diagnosis of aHUS, and the latter remains, to date, a diagnosis by exclusion. Furthermore, the precise spectrum of complement-mediated renal thrombotic microangiopathy is still a matter of debate. Nevertheless, long-term management of aHUS is increasingly individualized and lifelong C5 blockade is no longer a paradigm that applies to all patients with this disease. The potential benefit of complement blockade in other forms of HUS, notably secondary HUS, remains uncertain.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Nephrotic Syndrome III : Nursing Management

