Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

829
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
829
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

507
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
507
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

437
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
437
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

377
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
377
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity01:24

Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity

405
A stroke engine has a slider-crank mechanism that converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider.
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
405
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

399
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
399

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reassessing Choice Probability: What 59 Macaque Studies Tell Us About Decision-Related Activity in Visual Cortex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Flexible Perception of Tactile Cues in Multiple Reference Frames.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Flexible computation of object motion and depth based on viewing geometry inferred from optic flow.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Stochastic Optimal Control and Estimation with Multiplicative and Internal Noise.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2025
Same author

Seeing a Three-Dimensional World in Motion: How the Brain Computes Object Motion and Depth During Self-Motion.

Annual review of vision science·2025
Same author

Flexible computation of object motion and depth based on viewing geometry inferred from optic flow.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.5K

Scene-relative object motion biases depth percepts.

Ranran L French1, Gregory C DeAngelis2

  • 1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, USA.

Scientific Reports
|November 3, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Object motion relative to a scene can bias depth perception derived from motion parallax. This effect, particularly strong in monocular vision, impacts how we perceive 3D space during self-motion.

More Related Videos

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

12.7K
Controlled Rotation of Human Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment
09:11

Controlled Rotation of Human Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.5K
MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

12.7K
Controlled Rotation of Human Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment
09:11

Controlled Rotation of Human Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Visual neuroscience
  • Perception psychology
  • Computational vision

Background:

  • The visual system uses motion parallax from 2D retinal images to infer 3D scene structure.
  • Motion parallax relies on relative image motion of objects at different distances during observer translation.
  • Existing research on motion parallax for depth perception assumes stationary objects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether object motion relative to a scene biases depth perception derived from motion parallax.
  • To determine if the brain correctly isolates self-motion-induced image motion for depth computation.
  • To examine the influence of monocular versus binocular cues on these biases.

Main Methods:

  • Human subjects viewed a virtual 3D scene with simulated lateral self-motion (optic flow).
  • A target object was either stationary or moved laterally relative to the scene.
  • Subjects judged the target object's depth, with varying object motion and visual cues (monocular/binocular).

Main Results:

  • A 'far' bias in depth judgment occurred when object and observer moved in the same direction.
  • A 'near' bias was observed when object and observer moved in opposite directions.
  • Biases were significant in monocular viewing and reduced, but not eliminated, with binocular disparity cues.

Conclusions:

  • Scene-relative object motion significantly confounds depth judgments based on motion parallax.
  • The brain appears to conflate image motion from self-motion and scene-relative object motion.
  • Binocular disparity cues partially mitigate but do not fully resolve these motion-based depth perception errors.