Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Quantitative Static and Dynamic Assessment of Balance Control in Stroke Patients
Published on: May 17, 2020
Age and gender differences in static and dynamic balance of Chinese preschool children
Ruiyuan Li1, Meng Liu1, Jiefeng Zhu2
1Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Insights
Preschool children
Area of Science:
- Pediatric motor development
- Human kinetics
- Childhood physical education
Background:
- Balance is a critical developmental skill in early childhood.
- Conflicting evidence exists regarding age and gender influences on preschooler balance.
- Varied assessment tools hinder the establishment of normative balance data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate preschool children's balance ability.
- To determine the moderating effects of age and gender on balance.
- To establish normative balance data using multiple assessment methods.
Main Methods:
- 619 children aged 3-6 years participated.
- Static balance assessed via one-leg stance (OST) and tandem stance (TS).
- Dynamic balance evaluated using balance beam test (BBT) and functional reach test (FRT).
Main Results:
- Girls outperformed boys in OST, TS, and FRT, but not BBT.
- Balance performance significantly improved with age across all tested metrics.
- No significant interaction effects were found between age groups and sex.
Conclusions:
- Both age and gender significantly impact static and dynamic balance in preschoolers.
- Postural stability generally improves with age, with gender-specific differences observed.
- The study provides valuable age- and gender-specific reference values for monitoring balance development.
Abstract:
Objectives: Balance is a crucial ability of early age, but there is conflicting evidence with regard to age and gender differences in preschool children's balance ability. Additionally, there are several tools available to measure balance, yet, wide variation in their use has restricted the capacity to synthesize the reference values. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to investigate the balance ability of preschool-aged children and determine how it is moderated by age and gender. The analysis pertained to determining whether different testing methods affect the results of static or dynamic balancing ability to provide a basis for normative balance ability data for healthy boys and girls between 3 and 6 years of age. Method: Six hundred and nineteen preschool children (296 boys and 323 girls) aged 3-6 years participated in the study. The static balance (SB) was assessed with children standing on one leg (OST) and in a tandem stance (TS) with respect to time. The balance beam test (BBT) and functional reach test (FRT) were used to evaluate dynamic balance (DB) by measuring the time spent and the distance reached, respectively. Result: The results revealed significant differences in OST with respect to gender (η2 = 0.037, p < 0.001), TS (η2 = 0.026, p < 0.001) and FRT (η2 = 0.016, p = 0.002); the girls performed better than boys on most balance tests except on BBT (η2 = 0.000, p = 0.596). Age had positive effects on the static and dynamic balance performance on the OST (η2 = 0.336, p < 0.001), TS (η2 = 0.205, p < 0.001), BBT (η2 = 0.367, p < 0.001) and FRT (η2 = 0.392, p < 0.001). Older children performed better than their younger counterparts. No significant interactions between age groups and sex were found. Conclusion: This study revealed that static and dynamic balance stability in preschool-aged children was affected by gender and age. Gender dimorphism is present in preschool children, older girls displayed better postural stability than boys, and balance performance improved with age. In addition, the study provides age- and gender-specific balance performance reference values for preschool children across multiple methods, which can be used to monitor static and dynamic balance development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?

