Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Interaction Between Race and Income on Cardiac Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Anirudh Kumar1, Gregory O Ogunnowo1, Umesh N Khot1
1Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH.
Insights
Black Americans experience worse cardiac outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention, with income disparities impacting long-term results. Novel strategies are needed to address social determinants of health and improve cardiac care for all racial groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Disparities
- Social Determinants of Health
Background:
- Black Americans exhibit a higher incidence of cardiac events post-percutaneous coronary intervention compared to White Americans.
- Existing research indicates disparities in cardiac event prevalence related to race and socioeconomic factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between race and neighborhood income on cardiac events following percutaneous coronary intervention.
- To determine if neighborhood income modifies the impact of race on post-percutaneous coronary intervention cardiac outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 23,822 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention between 2000 and 2016.
- Assessment of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events at 3 and 10 years.
- Neighborhood income derived from zip code-based median adjusted annual gross household income; adjusted for race, income, and their interaction.
Main Results:
- Black Americans had worse baseline cardiac risk profiles and lower neighborhood income than White Americans.
- At 10-year follow-up, increasing income was linked to better outcomes only in White Americans.
- Multivariable models showed income, Black race, and their interaction as significant predictors of major adverse cardiac events and cardiac death.
Conclusions:
- Early post-percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes were influenced by risk factors in both Black Americans and lower-income individuals.
- Late 10-year outcomes revealed an independent effect of race and income, with income benefits primarily for White Americans.
- Novel care strategies addressing risk factors and social determinants of health are crucial for mitigating cardiac outcome disparities.
Abstract:
Background Compared with White Americans, Black Americans have a greater prevalence of cardiac events following percutaneous coronary intervention. We evaluated the association between race and neighborhood income on post-percutaneous coronary intervention cardiac events and assessed whether income modifies the effect of race on this relationship. Methods and Results Consecutive patients (n=23 822) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016, were included. All-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac event were assessed at 3 years. Extended 10-year follow-up was performed for those residing locally (n=1285). Neighborhood income was derived using median adjusted annual gross household income reported within the patient's zip code. We compared differences in treatment and outcomes, adjusting for race, income, and their interaction. In total, 3173 (13.3%) patients self-identified as Black Americans, and 20 649 (86.7%) self-identified as White Americans. Black Americans had a worse baseline cardiac risk profile and lower neighborhood income compared with White Americans. Although risk profile improved with increasing income in White Americans, no difference was observed across incomes among Black Americans. Despite similar long-term outpatient cardiology follow-up and medication prescription, risk profiles among Black Americans remained worse. At 3 years, unadjusted all-cause mortality (18.0% versus 15.2%; P<0.001) and major adverse cardiac event (37.3% versus 34.6%; P<0.001) were greater among Black Americans and with lower income (both P<0.001); race, income, and their interaction were not significant predictors in multivariable models. At 10-year follow-up, increasing income was associated with improved outcomes only in White Americans but not Black Americans. In multivariable models for major adverse cardiac event, income (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97 [95% CI, 0.96-0.98]; P=0.005), Black race (HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.58-1.96]; P=0.006), and their interaction (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]; P=0.003) were significant predictors. Similar findings were observed for cardiac death. Conclusions Early 3-year post-percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes were driven by worse risk factor profiles in both Black Americans and those with lower neighborhood income. However, late 10-year outcomes showed an independent effect of race and income, with improving outcomes with greater income limited to White Americans. These findings illustrate the importance of developing novel care strategies that address both risk factor modification and social determinants of health to mitigate disparities in cardiac outcomes.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology