Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Patient experiences with clinical confirmatory genetic testing after using direct-to-consumer raw DNA and third-party
Tiffany T Nguyen Dolphyn1,2, Kelly E Ormond1,3,4, Scott M Weissman5
1Department of Genetics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305USA.
Individuals using raw DNA tests experienced emotional distress and sought information after finding potential genetic risks. Despite challenges, most found personal utility and would use direct-to-consumer genetic testing again.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Bioinformatics
- Consumer Health
Background:
- Direct-to-consumer (DTC) raw DNA testing offers genetic health risk information but can yield analytical false-positives.
- Limited understanding exists regarding individuals' experiences with DTC raw DNA interpretation, clinical confirmation, and potential genetic variant findings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the lived experiences of individuals who underwent clinical confirmatory genetic testing after discovering potential pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants via raw DNA interpretation.
- To understand participants' perceptions of the confirmatory testing process and its associated challenges and benefits.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews with 12 participants recruited via social media.
- Participants had raw DNA interpretation results, U.S.-based clinical confirmatory genetic testing, and provided documentation.
- Interview transcripts were analyzed using inductive coding to identify emergent themes.
Main Results:
- Nearly all participants (11/12) reported emotional distress and information-seeking behaviors post-raw DNA interpretation.
- A majority (9/12) faced challenges accessing knowledgeable healthcare providers and securing insurance for confirmatory testing.
- Only 3/12 participants had their raw DNA findings confirmed as pathogenic or likely pathogenic via clinical testing.
Conclusions:
- Individuals derive personal utility from raw DNA interpretation, despite potential inaccuracies and the emotional impact.
- There is a need for improved patient and healthcare provider education regarding DTC genetic testing and its implications.
- Despite concerns and challenges, a strong interest persists in utilizing DTC genetic interpretation services.
More Related Videos
09:34Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
09:30Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
Published on: August 17, 2022