Content Analysis of Patient-Facing Information Related to Preeclampsia

Previous research has shown pregnant people are not knowledgeable about preeclampsia, a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. This lack of knowledge may impact their ability to report symptoms, comply with recommendations, and receive appropriate follow-up care. Pregnant people commonly seek information from sources outside their treating clinician, including pregnancy-specific books and online sources. We examined commonly used preeclampsia information sources to evaluate whether pregnant people are receiving up-to-date, guideline-based information.

We conducted a content analysis of preeclampsia-related information in top-ranking websites and bestselling pregnancy books. We used American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists preeclampsia guidelines to construct a codebook, which we used to examine source content completeness and accuracy. For each source, we analyzed information about preeclampsia diagnosis, patient-reported symptoms, risk factors, prevention, treatment, and complications.

Across 19 included sources (13 websites and 6 books), we found substantial variation in completeness and accuracy of preeclampsia information. We found high rates of mentions for preeclampsia symptoms. Risk factors were more commonly included in online sources than book sources. Most sources mentioned treatment options, including blood pressure medication and giving birth; however, one-third of online sources positively mentioned the nonrecommended treatment of bed rest. Prevention methods, including prenatal aspirin for high-risk pregnancies, and long-term complications of preeclampsia were infrequently mentioned.

Varying rates of accuracy in patient-facing preeclampsia information mean there is substantial room for improvement in these sources. Ensuring pregnant people receive current guideline-based information is critical for improving outcomes and implementing shared decision-making.