Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia
Published on: November 6, 2017
Total retinal thickness: a neglected factor in the evaluation of inner retinal thickness
Mark Banghart1, Kyungmoo Lee2, Mozhdeh Bahrainian1
1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Aim:
To determine whether macular retinal nerve fibre layer (mRNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thicknesses vary by ethnicity after accounting for total retinal thickness.
Methods:
We included healthy participants from the UK Biobank cohort who underwent macula-centred spectral domain-optical coherence tomography scans. mRNFL and GC-IPL thicknesses were determined for groups from different self-reported ethnic backgrounds. Multivariable regression models adjusting for covariables including age, gender, ethnicity and refractive error were built, with and without adjusting for total retinal thickness.
Results:
20237 participants were analysed. Prior to accounting for total retinal thickness, mRNFL thickness was on average 0.9 microm (-1.2, -0.6; p<0.001) lower among Asians and 1.5 microm (-2.3, -0.6; p<0.001) lower among black participants compared with white participants. Prior to accounting for total retinal thickness, the average GC-IPL thickness was 1.9 microm (-2.5, -1.4; p<0.001) lower among Asians compared with white participants, and 2.4 microm (-3.9, -1.0; p=0.001) lower among black participants compared with white participants. After accounting for total retinal thickness, the layer thicknesses were not significantly different among ethnic groups. When considered as a proportion of total retinal thickness, mRNFL thickness was ~0.1 and GC-IPL thickness was ~0.2 across age, gender and ethnic groups.
Conclusions:
The previously reported ethnic differences in layer thickness among groups are likely driven by differences in total retinal thickness. Our results suggest using layer thickness ratio (retinal layer thicknesses/total retinal thickness) rather than absolute thickness values when comparing retinal layer thicknesses across groups.

