Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Defining the gap in heart failure treatment in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
Samaneh Salimian1, Nima Moghaddam1, Marc W Deyell1
1Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Insights
Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) uptake is low in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), despite high eligibility. Optimization gaps highlight the need for quality initiatives in device clinics.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
- Pharmacotherapy
Background:
- Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) use is not well-documented in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who also have cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).
- Understanding GDMT patterns in this complex patient group is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the eligibility, uptake, dosage, contraindications, and barriers to contemporary medical therapy in HFrEF patients with CRT and/or ICDs.
- To identify areas for improvement in GDMT prescription and titration within cardiac device clinics.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients with HFrEF receiving CRT and/or ICDs.
- Data were collected from two Canadian tertiary care device clinics between March 1 and May 31, 2021.
- Included were 227 patients from 1005 device clinic consultations.
Main Results:
- Eligibility for GDMT was high, with 99.6% for beta-blockers, 89.0% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), 84.6% for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), and 87.7% for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2I).
- Uptake was high for beta-blockers (97.4%) but lower for MRA (63.0%), ARNI (46.7%), and SGLT2I (22.9%).
- Target doses were achieved by less than half of patients for MRA (10.5%) and ARNI (47.7%), indicating significant titration gaps.
Conclusions:
- Despite high eligibility, substantial gaps exist in the prescription and titration of GDMT for HFrEF patients with CRT/ICDs.
- Quality assurance initiatives within cardiac device clinics are essential to enhance the care of these patients.
Background:
The use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is poorly described in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).
Objective:
To define the eligibility, uptake, dose, contraindications, and barriers to uptake of contemporary medical therapy in this population.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis of consecutive adults with ICD and/or CRT attending two Canadian tertiary centre device clinics between 1 March and 31 May 2021.
Results:
From 1005 device clinic consultations, 227 (22.6%) patients with HFrEF and CRT and/or ICD were included. GDMT eligibility was high: beta-blockers (99.6%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) (89.0%), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) (84.6%), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) (87.7%). Contraindications were rare: beta-blockers (0.4%), MRA (11.0%), ARNI (15.4%), and SGLT2I (12.3%). Uptake of GDMT was high for beta-blockers (97.4%) but low for other medications: MRA (63.0%), ARNI (46.7%), SGLT2I (22.9%). Except for SGLT2I (84.6%) and beta-blockers (57.9%), less than one-half of patients were prescribed target-doses of MRA (10.5%), and ARNI (47.7%). Of the visits, GDMT was already optimal in 16%, electrophysiologists acted in 33% (21% prescribed, 7% ordered investigations, 5% referred to heart function services), and in the remaining visits, optimization was either deferred to another cardiologist (20%) or no plan was mentioned (25%), besides other reasons (4%).
Conclusion:
Despite broad eligibility for GDMT in patients with HFrEF and ICD/CRT, significant gaps in prescription and titration exist. Our results highlight the need to embed quality assurance initiatives in cardiac device clinics to improve HFrEF care.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

