Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Using a Murine Model of Psychosocial Stress in Pregnancy as a Translationally Relevant Paradigm for Psychiatric Disorders in Mothers and Infants
Published on: June 13, 2021
Applying Interdisciplinary Frameworks to Study Prenatal Influences on Child Development
Marie Camerota1,2, Michael T Willoughby3
1Brown University.
Insights
New frameworks emphasize prenatal experience for long-term child development and health. These medical-origin theories align with and expand modern developmental science principles across the lifespan.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Science
- Psychology
- Public Health
Background:
- Modern developmental science utilizes a lifespan approach from infancy to senescence.
- Emerging research frameworks, such as fetal origins and the first 1000 days, highlight prenatal influences on development.
- These frameworks, originating in medical literature, share principles with developmental psychology but introduce novel considerations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe emerging research frameworks prioritizing prenatal experience.
- To analyze the alignment and divergence of these frameworks with modern developmental science.
- To explore how these new perspectives inform the broader study of developmental influences and outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and conceptual analysis.
- Comparative analysis of developmental science principles and new prenatal-focused frameworks.
- Discussion of implications for understanding developmental trajectories.
Main Results:
- Prenatal experience frameworks (e.g., developmental origins of health and disease) are increasingly adopted outside psychology.
- These frameworks share core tenets with developmental science, focusing on early life as critical.
- New questions arise regarding broader developmental influences, outcomes, and contexts.
Conclusions:
- Emerging prenatal-focused frameworks enrich and challenge traditional developmental science.
- Interdisciplinary dialogue is crucial for integrating medical and psychological perspectives on development.
- A comprehensive understanding of development requires considering influences from conception onwards.
Abstract:
Modern developmental science is informed by several shared principles and adopts a lifespan approach that goes from infancy to senescence. Increasingly, disciplines outside psychology are adopting research frameworks (e.g., fetal origins, developmental origins of health and disease, first 1000 days) that prioritize prenatal experience as a driver of children's long-term health and developmental outcomes. Despite originating in medical literatures, these new frameworks share many of the core tenets of modern developmental theories. However, they also raise new questions and provoke a broader consideration of developmental influences, outcomes, and contexts. In this article, we describe these frameworks and consider how they align with, differ from, and inform modern developmental science.
More Related Videos
09:09Generating a Reproducible Model of Mid-Gestational Maternal Immune Activation using PolyI:C to Study Susceptibility and Resilience in Offspring
Published on: August 17, 2022
19:15Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Related Concept Videos
The Nativist Approach
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Information Processing Approach
Introduction to Biological Bases of Psychology
The nervous system, the cornerstone of...
Nature and Nurture