Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation01:30

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

27
Heart failure can be classified in various ways, with the most common classifications based on physical activity limitations, disease progression, severity, and treatment strategies.The Functional Classification of Heart Failure divides patients into four categories based on physical activity limitation due to symptom burden.Class I: Patients in this class have cardiac disease but no physical activity limitations. Ordinary activities like walking, climbing stairs, or routine tasks do not cause...
27
Heart Failure I: Introduction01:27

Heart Failure I: Introduction

43
Heart failure refers to a clinical syndrome caused by structural or functional cardiac disorders that prevent the heart from pumping an adequate amount of blood to meet the body's metabolic needs. This condition often arises from myocardial infarction or ischemia, leading to decreased cardiac output, reduced tissue perfusion, impaired gas exchange, fluid volume imbalance, and decreased functional ability.Heart failure can result from disruptions in the mechanisms that regulate cardiac output...
43
Heart Failure V: Medical Management01:30

Heart Failure V: Medical Management

19
Medical Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF)The primary goals of therapy for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) include:Relieving symptomsOptimizing volume statusSupporting oxygenation and ventilationMaintaining cardiac output (CO) and end-organ perfusionIdentifying and addressing the cause of ADHFPreventing complicationsProviding patient education on factors precipitating HF exacerbationPlanning for dischargeOngoing monitoring and assessment...
19
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy01:29

Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

37
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or HCM, is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by asymmetric left ventricular hypertrophy without ventricular dilation. It is more common in men and is typically diagnosed in young, athletic adults.EtiologyHCM is primarily genetic and is caused by mutations in genes encoding sarcomeric proteins. Researchers have identified over 1400 mutations across at least 11 different genes. Among these, the most frequently occurring mutations are found in the...
37
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions01:30

Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions

130
The first step in nursing management of a patient with heart failure involves thoroughly assessing the patient's medical history.Subjective Data: Obtain the patient's medical history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, myocardial infarction, and symptoms like dyspnea, orthopnea, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea.Objective Data: Conduct a physical examination to identify findings such as jugular vein distention, pulmonary crackles, tachycardia, murmurs, peripheral edema, and vital signs,...
130
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies01:22

Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

25
Additional therapies for treating patients with heart failure (HF) may include procedural interventions, supplemental oxygen, the management of sleep disorders, and nutritional therapy.Procedural InterventionsImplantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: For patients at risk of life-threatening arrhythmias due to severe left ventricular dysfunction, an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) can detect and terminate these arrhythmias, preventing sudden cardiac death and improving survival rates.
25

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reference equations for peak oxygen uptake during cycle ergometry based on body composition estimates.

BMJ open sport & exercise medicine·2026
Same author

Cardiovascular event burden in women with breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a retrospective matched cohort study.

Cardio-oncology (London, England)·2026
Same author

Metabolic determinants of cancer immunotherapy outcomes identified by plasma profiling.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Association Between Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events (PREVENT) Risk Scores and Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease: Insights From the Project Baseline Health Study.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Impact of the 2025 ASE Guidelines on the Classification of LV Diastolic Dysfunction in the Community: A Project Baseline Health Study.

Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging·2026
Same author

Determinants and prognostic value of blood pressure trajectories during graded exercise.

European journal of applied physiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K

Improving predictive performance in incident heart failure using machine learning and multi-center data.

František Sabovčik1, Evangelos Ntalianis1, Nicholas Cauwenberghs1

  • 1Research Unit of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
|November 4, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Multi-center machine learning models significantly improve heart failure risk prediction compared to single-center approaches. Advanced models like stacking methods offer superior accuracy for early heart failure detection.

Keywords:
heart failureincidencemachine learningmulti-center dataprediction model

More Related Videos

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:16

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

195
In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
09:09

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:16

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

195
In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
09:09

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

1.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Computational Health

Background:

  • Primary prevention of heart failure (HF) is crucial for mitigating its societal burden.
  • Early risk stratification for HF necessitates advanced computational methods, including machine learning (ML), to analyze complex individual patterns in large datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive performance of incident HF risk models.
  • To evaluate flexible ML models against linear models.
  • To assess models trained on single-center versus multi-center data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized meta-data from 30,354 individuals across 6 cohorts with a median follow-up of 5.40 years.
  • Evaluated survival gradient boosting (SGB), CoxNet, PCP-HF risk score, and a stacking method.
  • Employed iterative predictions with one cohort as the external test set and remaining cohorts as the training set (single- or multi-center).

Main Results:

  • Multi-center models consistently outperformed single-center models.
  • SGB achieved a higher c-index (0.735) than CoxNet (0.694) in the pooled population.
  • A stacking method integrating multiple models achieved the highest PR/AUC (0.804) for 10-year HF risk prediction, significantly outperforming PCP-HF (0.551).

Conclusions:

  • Training models on diverse, multi-center data enhances their ability to learn a wider range of individual health characteristics.
  • Flexible ML algorithms are effective in capturing diverse data distributions for more precise HF prediction models.