Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

229
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
229
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

310
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
310
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.3K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.3K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

13.3K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
13.3K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.8K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MATTERIX: toward a digital twin for robotics-assisted chemistry laboratory automation.

Nature computational science·2025
Same author

Accelerating discovery in natural science laboratories with AI and robotics: Perspectives and challenges.

Science robotics·2025
Same author

"Data will solve robotics and automation: True or false?": A debate.

Science robotics·2025
Same author

Continuous-Time Fitted Value Iteration for Robust Policies.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2022
Same author

Integration of Reinforcement Learning in a Virtual Robotic Surgical Simulation.

Surgical innovation·2022
Same author

Learning latent actions to control assistive robots.

Autonomous robots·2021
Same journal

Granular Ball-Based Noise-Resistant Fuzzy Multineighborhood Feature Selection via Label Enhancement and Feature Graph.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Fighting Evolving Spam With ARTMAP Models: A Noise-Resilient Online Detection Framework.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

HyperSAT: Unsupervised Hypergraph Neural Networks for Weighted MaxSAT Problems.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Negation of Basic Belief Assignment in Multisource Information Fusion on Dempster-Shafer Theory With Applications in Pattern Classification.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Intervention Feasible Region and Driver Risk Capacity Aware Human-Machine Collaborative Safe Trajectory Planning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

A Unified Differential Denoising Learning Framework With a Pre-Trained Model and Fuzzy Graph Networks for Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 23, 2025

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.0K

Monotonic Quantile Network for Worst-Case Offline Reinforcement Learning.

Chenjia Bai, Ting Xiao, Zhoufan Zhu

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    |November 4, 2022
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a safe reinforcement learning method for critical domains. It uses a monotonic quantile network and conservative quantile regression to ensure policies are risk-averse and avoid unsafe actions.

    More Related Videos

    Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit
    05:30

    Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit

    Published on: September 8, 2023

    637
    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Aug 23, 2025

    WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
    08:18

    WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

    Published on: August 15, 2020

    5.0K
    Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit
    05:30

    Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit

    Published on: September 8, 2023

    637
    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Machine Learning
    • Robotics

    Background:

    • Ensuring safety in offline reinforcement learning (RL) is crucial for safety-critical applications.
    • Optimizing distributional value functions in offline RL faces challenges like quantile crossing and distribution shift.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a risk-averse policy learning method for offline RL.
    • To address challenges in learning distributional value functions and ensure policy safety.

    Main Methods:

    • Proposed a monotonic quantile network (MQN) for learning return distributions with non-crossing quantiles.
    • Implemented conservative quantile regression (CQR) to penalize out-of-distribution actions.
    • Learned a worst-case policy by optimizing conditional value-at-risk (CVaR).

    Main Results:

    • The proposed method, MQN with CQR, effectively learns safe and conservative policies.
    • Experimental results in robotic locomotion tasks demonstrate the method's efficacy in both risk-neutral and risk-sensitive settings.
    • Theoretical analysis confirmed fixed-point convergence of the method.

    Conclusions:

    • The MQN with CQR approach successfully enables safe and risk-averse policy learning in offline RL.
    • This method is particularly valuable for safety-critical domains requiring conservative decision-making.
    • The non-crossing quantile guarantee and OOD action penalty are key to achieving robust and safe policies.