Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

182
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
182
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

712
Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
712
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

1.3K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
1.3K
Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

749
Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
749
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conspiracy theories and clinical decision-making.

Bioethics·2023
Same author

Virtue and care ethics & humanism in medical education: a scoping review.

BMC medical education·2022
Same author

Altruism Discussions in the Time of Pandemic: May We Ask, May They Tell?

The Journal of clinical ethics·2021
Same author

Further Ethical Concerns for Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension in Medicine.

AJOB neuroscience·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.7K

A Mixed Judgment Standard for Surrogate Decision-Making.

Nathan Stout1

  • 1Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|November 5, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new standard for surrogate decision-making, addressing challenges with the Substituted Judgment Standard (SJS). The proposed alternative aims to improve medical choices for incapacitated patients while respecting autonomy.

Keywords:
decision-making capacitysubstituted judgmentsurrogate decision-making

More Related Videos

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
11:05

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

15.1K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.7K
SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
11:05

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

15.1K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Medicine

Background:

  • The Substituted Judgment Standard (SJS) is commonly used for surrogate decision-making for incapacitated patients.
  • SJS requires surrogates to make decisions the patient would have made if capacitated.
  • SJS faces significant criticism due to epistemic difficulties in determining patient preferences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an alternative standard for surrogate decision-making.
  • To address the epistemic challenges inherent in the SJS.
  • To preserve patient autonomy in medical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of surrogate decision-making standards.
  • Development of a novel ethical framework for medical decision-making.
  • Theoretical examination of autonomy and surrogate roles.

Main Results:

  • An alternative standard to SJS is presented.
  • This new standard circumvents the epistemic difficulties of SJS.
  • The proposed standard maintains respect for patient autonomy.

Conclusions:

  • A viable alternative to the Substituted Judgment Standard exists.
  • This alternative standard offers a practical solution to decision-making challenges.
  • Respect for patient autonomy can be effectively upheld through this new framework.