Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Receptor Autoradiography Protocol for the Localized Visualization of Angiotensin II Receptors
Published on: June 7, 2016
Biased agonists differentially modulate the receptor conformation ensembles in Angiotensin II type 1 receptor
Anita K Nivedha1, Sangbae Lee1, Nagarajan Vaidehi1
1Department of Computational & Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, California, 91010, USA.
Abstract:
The structural features that contribute to the efficacy of biased agonists targeting G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) towards G proteins or β-arrestin (β-arr) signaling pathways is nebulous, although such knowledge is critical in designing biased ligands. The dynamics of the agonist-GPCR complex is one of the critical factors in determining agonist bias. Angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) is an ideal model system to study the molecular basis of bias since it has multiple β-arr2 and Gq protein biased agonists as well as experimentally solved three dimensional structures. Using Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations for the Angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) bound to ten different agonists, we infer that the agonist bound receptor samples conformations with different relative weights, from both the inactive and active state ensembles of the receptor. This concept is perhaps extensible to other class A GPCRs. Such a weighted mixed ensemble recapitulates the inter-residue distance distributions measured for different agonists bound AT1R using DEER experiments. The ratio of the calculated relative strength of the allosteric communication to β-arr2 vs Gq coupling sites scale similarly to the experimentally measured bias factors. Analysis of the inter-residue distance distributions of the activation microswitches involved in class A GPCR activation suggests that β-arr2 biased agonists turn on different combination of microswitches with different relative strengths of activation. We put forth a model that activation microswitches behave like rheostats that tune the relative efficacy of the biased agonists toward the two signaling pathways. Finally, based on our data we propose that the agonist specific residue contacts in the binding site elicit a combinatorial response in the microswitches that in turn differentially modulate the receptor conformation ensembles resulting in differences in coupling to Gq and β-arrestin.
More Related Videos
09:51Live Cell Imaging and 3D Analysis of Angiotensin Receptor Type 1a Trafficking in Transfected Human Embryonic Kidney Cells Using Confocal Microscopy
Published on: March 27, 2017
09:09Preparation and Delivery of Protein Microcrystals in Lipidic Cubic Phase for Serial Femtosecond Crystallography
Published on: September 20, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Agonist
Agonists can bind to receptors in different ways. Some agonists bind directly to the receptor's active site, mimicking the endogenous...
Adrenergic Receptors: ɑ Subtype
Adrenaline ≥ Noradrenaline >> Isoprenaline
α-adrenoceptors are further divided into α1 and α2-adrenoceptors.
α1-Adrenoceptors: These receptors are located postsynaptically on the effector organs and cause constriction of smooth muscle mediated by activation of phospholipase...
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with...
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of ɑ-Receptor Blockers
Nonselective α-blockers: Nonselective α-blockers contain haloalkylamine or imidazoline...
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of...