Sex Differences in Periprocedural and Long-Term Outcomes Following Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A

Sheetal Vasundara Mathai1, Sumit Sohal2, Elie Flatow1

  • 1Department of Medicine, NYC Health +Hospitals/Jacobi Medical Center, 1400 Pelham Pkwy S, Bronx, NY 10461, United States of America.

Insights

Women undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) face higher periprocedural risks, including stroke and mortality. However, long-term outcomes after LAAO show no significant sex-based differences in stroke or mortality risks.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases stroke risk, making left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) a key intervention for patients unsuitable for anticoagulation.
  • Systematic evaluation of sex-based differences in LAAO outcomes is crucial for personalized patient care.
  • Previous studies have not comprehensively analyzed sex disparities in LAAO efficacy and safety.

Approach:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 studies involving 111,775 patients (40.7% women) was conducted.
  • Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) were searched up to March 2022 for LAAO outcome data.
  • Primary outcomes included periprocedural stroke, bleeding, pericardial events, and mortality; secondary outcomes assessed long-term risks.

Key Points:

  • Women experienced significantly higher risks of periprocedural stroke (RR 1.85), major bleeding (RR 1.63), and mortality (RR 1.94) compared to men.
  • Pericardial complications were also more frequent in women (RR 1.80).
  • No significant sex differences were observed in long-term risks of stroke, major bleeding, device-related thrombus, or mortality.

Conclusions:

  • Women undergoing LAAO have a higher risk of periprocedural complications than men.
  • These increased periprocedural risks in women do not appear to persist into long-term follow-up.
  • LAAO remains a viable stroke prevention strategy in AF, but sex-specific risk stratification for periprocedural events warrants further investigation.
Abstract