5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening

Cheol Hyun Lee1, Chang-Wook Nam1, Yun-Kyeong Cho1

  • 1Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

JACC. Asia
|November 7, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Simple crossover stenting alone for coronary bifurcation lesions shows acceptable 5-year outcomes, similar to adding side branch opening procedures. This finding supports the simpler approach for treating complex coronary artery disease.

Area of Science:

  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • The optimal treatment strategy for side branch (SB) management in coronary artery bifurcation lesions after simple crossover stenting remains debated.
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions requires careful consideration of stent technique to optimize outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the long-term clinical outcomes of a simple crossover stenting strategy versus adding a side branch (SB)-opening procedure.
  • To evaluate outcomes in patients with both left main (LM) and non-LM coronary bifurcation lesions.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective analysis of patients from the Coronary Bifurcation Stenting (COBIS) III registry undergoing a 1-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: simple crossover alone and those receiving an additional SB-opening procedure.
  • The primary endpoint was the 5-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion repeat revascularization.

Main Results:

  • The 5-year TLF rate was similar between the simple crossover group (7.0%) and the SB-opening group (6.7%) (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.66-1.48; P=0.947).
  • Subgroup analyses for left main (LM) and true bifurcation lesions also showed no significant difference in TLF rates.
  • No significant difference was observed in the overall or SB-related target lesion revascularization rates between the two groups.

Conclusions:

  • A 1-stent strategy using simple crossover alone for coronary bifurcation lesions yields acceptable long-term clinical outcomes.
  • The results suggest that additional SB-opening procedures may not be necessary to improve long-term outcomes in many bifurcation cases.
  • The findings from the COBIS III registry provide valuable insights into optimal stent strategies for complex coronary bifurcations.
Abstract