Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening
Cheol Hyun Lee1, Chang-Wook Nam1, Yun-Kyeong Cho1
1Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
Insights
Simple crossover stenting alone for coronary bifurcation lesions shows acceptable 5-year outcomes, similar to adding side branch opening procedures. This finding supports the simpler approach for treating complex coronary artery disease.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Research
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- The optimal treatment strategy for side branch (SB) management in coronary artery bifurcation lesions after simple crossover stenting remains debated.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions requires careful consideration of stent technique to optimize outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term clinical outcomes of a simple crossover stenting strategy versus adding a side branch (SB)-opening procedure.
- To evaluate outcomes in patients with both left main (LM) and non-LM coronary bifurcation lesions.
Main Methods:
- A prospective analysis of patients from the Coronary Bifurcation Stenting (COBIS) III registry undergoing a 1-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions.
- Patients were divided into two groups: simple crossover alone and those receiving an additional SB-opening procedure.
- The primary endpoint was the 5-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion repeat revascularization.
Main Results:
- The 5-year TLF rate was similar between the simple crossover group (7.0%) and the SB-opening group (6.7%) (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.66-1.48; P=0.947).
- Subgroup analyses for left main (LM) and true bifurcation lesions also showed no significant difference in TLF rates.
- No significant difference was observed in the overall or SB-related target lesion revascularization rates between the two groups.
Conclusions:
- A 1-stent strategy using simple crossover alone for coronary bifurcation lesions yields acceptable long-term clinical outcomes.
- The results suggest that additional SB-opening procedures may not be necessary to improve long-term outcomes in many bifurcation cases.
- The findings from the COBIS III registry provide valuable insights into optimal stent strategies for complex coronary bifurcations.
Background:
The optimal side branch (SB) treatment strategy after simple crossover stenting in bifurcation lesions is still controversial.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of a 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone versus with an additional SB-opening procedure in patients with left main (LM) and non-LM coronary bifurcation lesions.
Methods:
Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a 1-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions including LM were selected from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) III registry and divided into the simple crossover-alone group and SB-opening group. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the 5-year rate of target lesion failure (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion repeat revascularization).
Results:
Among 2,194 patients who underwent the 1-stent strategy, 1,685 (76.8%) patients were treated with simple crossover alone, and 509 (23.2%) patients were treated with an additional SB-opening procedure. Although the baseline SB angiographic disease was more severe in the SB-opening group, the final lumen diameter of the SB was larger. The 5-year observed target lesion failure rate was similar between the 2 groups (7.0% in the simple crossover vs. 6.7% in SB-opening group; hazard ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.48; p = 0.947), even in the subgroup analyses including LM (9.5% vs. 11.3%; p = 0.442) and true bifurcation (5.3% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.362). The results were not changed after an inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. There was no difference in the overall and SB-related target lesion revascularization rate in both groups.
Conclusions:
The long-term clinical outcome of the 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone for coronary bifurcation lesions was acceptable compared to those of additional SB-opening procedures. (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting [COBIS] Registry III [COBIS III]; NCT03068494).
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

