Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
The overestimation of concentric hypertrophy in patients with HFpEF as determined by 2D-echocardiography
Mohammad F Mathbout1, Hussam Al Hennawi2, Anwar Khedr3
1Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Cardiology, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Insights
Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography offers a more accurate assessment of left ventricular (LV) mass than two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. This study found 2D methods frequently over-diagnose LV hypertrophy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Echocardiography
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.
- Accurate left ventricular (LV) mass calculation is crucial for prognosis in structural heart disease.
- Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography relies on geometric assumptions, unlike three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of 2D versus 3D echocardiography in calculating LV mass.
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of both methods in identifying LV hypertrophy (LVH) in HFpEF patients.
Main Methods:
- Prospective review of echocardiography findings in 154 patients.
- Calculation of relative wall thickness (RWT) and LV mass using both 2D and 3D echocardiography.
- Comparison of LVH and concentric remodeling classifications between 2D and 3D methods.
Main Results:
- A weak positive correlation was found between 2D and 3D LV mass indices (R=0.534).
- 2D echocardiography over-diagnosed LV hypertrophy in 68% of normal patients and misclassified remodeling in HFpEF patients.
- In HFpEF patients, 2D identified LVH in 74% compared to only 30% with 3D echocardiography (p=0.001).
Conclusions:
- Compared to 3D echocardiography, 2D methods significantly overestimate LV mass, leading to over-diagnosis of LV hypertrophy.
- The majority of HFpEF patients exhibit no structural LV hypertrophy when assessed by 3D imaging.
- Findings suggest many HFpEF patients may benefit from pharmacological prevention strategies to avert LV remodeling.
Abstract:
Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction continues to pose multiple challenges in terms of accurate diagnosis, treatment, and associated morbidity. Accurate left ventricular (LV) mass calculation yields essential prognostic information relating to structural heart disease. Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography-based calculations are solely limited to LV geometric assumptions of symmetry, whereas three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography could overcome these limitations. This study aims to compare the performance of 2D and 3D LV mass calculations. Methods: A prospective review of echocardiography findings at the University of Louisville, Kentucky, was conducted and assessed. Normal ejection fraction (EF) was defined as >=52% in males and >=54% in females. The following calculations were performed: relative wall thickness (RWT) = 2x posterior wall thickness/LV internal diastolic dimension (LVIDd) and 2D LV mass = 0.8{1.04([LVIDd + IVSd +PWd]3 - LVIDd3)} + 0.6. Concentric hypertrophy was RWT >0.42 and LV mass >95 kg/m2 in females or >115 kg/m2 in males. The same cut-offs were used for 2D and 3D echocardiography. Results: Echocardiographic findings for a total number of 154 patients in the study were investigated. There was a weak positive correlation between 2D and 3D LV mass indices (R = 0.534, r2 = 0.286, p = 0.001). Seventy patients had 3D EF >=45% with clinical heart failure (HFpEF). Among HFpEF patients, LV hypertrophy (LVH) was present in 74% of patients by 2D echocardiography and 30% by 3D echocardiography (McNemar test p = 0.001). Using 3D echocardiography as the reference, 68% of normal patients were misdiagnosed with LV hypertrophy by 2D echocardiography. Two-thirds of the patients with concentric remodeling by 3D echocardiography were misclassified as having concentric hypertrophy by 2D echocardiography (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Adapting necropsy-proven LV mass index cutoffs, 2D over-diagnosed LV hypertrophy through overestimation of the mass, compared to 3D echocardiography. In turn, the majority of HFpEF patients showed no structural hypertrophy of the LV on 3D imaging. This suggests that the majority of patients with HFpEF may qualify for pharmacological prevention to prevent further progression to LV remodeling or LVH.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for...
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

