Related Experiment Video For HPV genotypes
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

RNAscope for In situ Detection of Transcriptionally Active Human Papillomavirus in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: March 11, 2014
Distribution of HPV genotypes among women with abnormal cytology results in Alberta, Canada
Sabrina S Plitt1,2, Ryan Kichuk3, Sheena Geier4
1Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Background:
Persistent infection with a subset of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes can cause abnormal cytology and invasive cervical cancer. This study examines the circulating HPV genotype strains in a local population of the province of Alberta (a largely unvaccinated population) to establish baseline frequency of vaccine and non-vaccine genotypes causing abnormal cervical cytology.
Method:
Remnant liquid-based cytology specimens from the Alberta Cervical Cancer Screening Program (March 2014-January 2016) were examined. Only specimens from women who had a cytology grading of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or higher were included. HPV genotype was determined for all samples, and results were stratified by demographics and cytology results.
Results:
Forty-four unique HPV genotypes were identified from 4,794 samples. Of the 4,241 samples with a genotype identified, the most common genotypes were HPV 16, 18, 31, and 51, with 1,599 (37.7%), 441 (12.2%), 329 (7.8%), and 354 (8.4%), respectively. HPV9 vaccine genotypes made up 73.2% of these genotyped samples. Compared with specimens in which HPV9 vaccine genotypes were not detected, those with a genotype covered by the HPV9 vaccine were from younger women (33 [interquartile range {IQR] 28 to 42] y versus 40 [IQR 32 to 51] y; p < 0.00001).
Conclusions:
The baseline distribution of HPV genotypes in this largely unvaccinated population indicates that the HPV9 vaccine provides good protection from high-risk HPV infections. Determining the frequency of genotypes causing abnormal cytology in this population post-vaccine implementation will be important to assess efficacy of vaccination and monitor for any potential genotype replacement.

