Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025
Monitoring the Wall Mechanics During Stent Deployment in a Vessel
Published on: May 8, 2012
Mechanical Performance Assessment of Physician Modified Aortic Stent Graft
Jennifer Canonge1, Frédéric Heim2, Nabil Chakfé3
1Groupe Européen de Recherche sur les Prothèses Appliquées à la Chirurgie Vasculaire (GEPROVAS), Strasbourg, France; Department of Vascular Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France.
Objective:
This study aimed to compare various fenestration configurations of physician modified aortic stent grafts in order to identify which design parameters have a significant influence on the mechanical behaviour of the fenestration.
Methods:
the fenestration configurations were considered according to different manufacturing parameters: cutting technique, fenestration reinforcement, suture material, reinforcement loop design, and number of suture points. The performance of the graft/bridging stent assembly was assessed at various levels: (1) branch pull out force; (2) fenestration enlargement and rupture strength; (3) balloon angioplasty resistance; and (4) behaviour under cyclic fatigue.
Results:
Sixty manual fenestrations were created. The tests performed on the fenestrations had several main findings. First, reinforcement increased the radial force on the branch, which increased the pull out force; this may limit migration of the bridging stent in vivo. The phenomenon was amplified with a snare reinforced fenestration, which seemed to be the most efficient. Moreover, increasing the number of suture passes also appeared to increase the branch extraction force securing the assembly. The enlargement tests showed that non-reinforced fenestrations had the weakest radial strength. This was confirmed with the balloon angioplasty test, which showed that these latter specimens undergo the most significant textile degradation. After fatigue tests, all fenestrations were larger, showing that elastic recoil was incomplete in all samples. The largest recoil was observed in the non-reinforced ophthalmological cautery (OC) fenestrations (40%). Regarding the behaviour of the samples up to rupture, all samples behaved in a similar way; however, the double loop fenestration strength level was the highest.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrated that the snare double loop reinforcement has an advantage regarding durability of the graft branch assembly. Moreover, non-reinforced fenestrations show signs of weakness and lack of stability, which questions the in situ or laser fenestration procedures.
