Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
Published on: July 31, 2016
Towards a better understanding of the social stigma of facial difference
Pauline Rasset1, Jessica Mange1, Benoît Montalan2
1Laboratoire de Psychologie de Caen Normandie (LPCN EA 7452), Université de Caen Normandie, France.
Abstract:
Facial difference (FD) is not only an individual experience; it is inherently social, reflecting interactions between social norms and individual attitudes. Often FD is stigmatized. In this paper, we employ a widely used stigma framework, namely the social stigma framework put forth by Pryor and Reeder (2011), to unpack the stigma of FD. This framework posits that there are four forms of stigma: public stigma, self-stigma, stigma by association, and structural stigma. We first discuss the social and psychological literature on FD as it pertains to these various forms of stigma. We then describe coping approaches for FD stigma. Lastly, we delineate evidence-based methods for addressing the various forms of FD stigma, such that future efforts can more effectively tackle the stigma of facial difference.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Stereotype Content Model
Prosopagnosia
Social Facilitation
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

