Semiautomatic interictal electric source localization based on long-term electroencephalographic monitoring: A
Laurent Spinelli1, Amir G Baroumand2,3, Serge Vulliemoz1
1EEG and Epilepsy Unit, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Objective:
Electric source imaging (ESI) of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) has shown significant yield in numerous studies; however, its implementation at most centers is labor- and cost-intensive. Semiautomatic ESI analysis (SAEA) has been proposed as an alternative and has previously shown benefit. Computer-assisted automatic spike cluster retrieval, averaging, and source localization are carried out for each cluster and are then reviewed by an expert neurophysiologist, to determine their relevance for the individual case. Here, we examine its yield in a prospective single center study.
Method:
Between 2017 and 2022, 122 patients underwent SAEA. Inclusion criteria for the current study were unifocal epilepsy disorder, epilepsy surgery with curative purpose, and postoperative follow-up of 2 years or more. All patients (N=40) had continuous video-electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring with 37 scalp electrodes, which underwent SAEA. Forty patients matched our inclusion criteria.
Results:
Twenty patients required intracranial monitoring; 13 were magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-negative. Mean duration of analyzed EEG was 4.3 days (±3.1 days), containing a mean of 12 749 detected IEDs (±22 324). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SAEA for localizing the epileptogenic focus of the entire group were 74.3%, 80%, and 75%, respectively, leading to an odds ratio (OR) of 11.5 to become seizure-free if the source was included in the resection volume (p < .05). In patients with extratemporal lobe epilepsy, our results indicated an accuracy of 68% (OR=11.7). For MRI-negative patients (n = 13) and patients requiring intracranial EEG (n = 20), we found a similarly high accuracy of 84.6% (OR=19) and 75% (OR = 15.9), respectively.
Significance:
In this prospective study of SAEA of long-term video-EEG, spanning several days, we found excellent localizing information and a high yield, even in difficult patient groups. This compares favorably to high-density ESI, most likely due to marked improved signal-to-noise ratio of the averaged IEDs. We propose including ESI, or SAEA, in the workup of all patients who are referred for epilepsy surgery.
