Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

205
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
205
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

5.8K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
5.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic, epigenetic, and electrophysiological markers of serotonergic function and SSRI-related nausea.

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

Emotion Regulation in the Preadolescent Brain and the Role of Individual Temperamental Differences.

Brain and behavior·2025
Same author

Neurophysiological correlates of short-term recognition of sounds: Insights from magnetoencephalography.

Brain and cognition·2025
Same author

Whole-brain computation of cognitive versus acoustic errors in music: A mismatch negativity study.

Neuroimage. Reports·2025
Same author

EEG Correlates of Auditory Short-Term Memory and Dissimilarity Perception in Young and Older Adults.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025
Same author

Working Memory Predicts Long-Term Recognition of Auditory Sequences: Dissociation Between Confirmed Predictions and Prediction Errors.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.6K

Brain recognition of previously learned versus novel temporal sequences: a differential simultaneous processing.

L Bonetti1,2,3,4, E Brattico1,5, S E P Bruzzone1,6,7

  • 1Center for Music in the Brain (MIB), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Universitetsbyen 3, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
|November 8, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The brain processes individual auditory sequence items rapidly and the whole sequence slowly. Previously memorized sequences engage slower brain activity, while novel sequences require faster processing.

Keywords:
brain dynamicsmagnetoencephalographymemory recognitionsource reconstructiontemporal sequences

More Related Videos

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.6K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.6K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.6K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception

Background:

  • Understanding neural mechanisms of sequence memory is crucial in neuroscience.
  • Limited knowledge exists on distinguishing memorized from novel temporal sequences in the brain.
  • Differential processing of individual items versus the entire sequence remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate brain mechanisms for recognizing previously memorized versus novel auditory temporal sequences.
  • Examine the distinct neural processing of single items and the overall sequence structure.
  • Differentiate the roles of fast and slow brain oscillations in temporal sequence recognition.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized magnetoencephalography (MEG) to record brain activity.
  • Analyzed brain processing of individual auditory sequence items.
  • Assessed neural processing of the entire temporal sequence structure.

Main Results:

  • Local sequence items were linked to rapid (2-8 Hz) brain processing.
  • The whole sequence involved slower (0.1-1 Hz) global brain processing across a network.
  • Memorized sequences showed stronger slow-wave activity; novel sequences engaged faster processing.

Conclusions:

  • Results reveal distinct neural processing for individual items and whole temporal sequences.
  • Slow brain oscillations are critical for recognizing familiar sequences.
  • Faster brain oscillations are more involved in processing novel temporal information.