Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 8, 2022
Spin-vibronic interaction induced reverse intersystem crossing: A case study with TXO-TPA and TXO-PhCz molecules
Pijush Karak1, Kenneth Ruud2, Swapan Chakrabarti1
1Department of Chemistry, University of Calcutta, 92 A. P. C. Road, Kolkata 700009, West Bengal, India.
Abstract:
We highlight the important roles the direct spin-orbit (DSO) coupling, the spin-vibronic (SV) coupling, and the dielectric constant of the medium play on the reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) mechanism of TXO-TPA and TXO-PhCz molecules. To understand this complex phenomenon, we have calculated the RISC rate constant, kRISC, using a time-dependent correlation function-based method within the framework of second-order perturbation theory. Our computed kRISC in two different solvents, toluene and chloroform, suggests that in addition to the DSO, a dielectric medium-dependent SV mechanism may also have a significant impact on the net enhancement of the rate of RISC from the lowest triplet state to the first excited singlet state. Whereas we have found that kRISC of TXO-TPA is mostly determined by the DSO contribution independent of the choice of the solvent, the SV mechanism contributes more than 30% to the overall kRISC of TXO-PhCz in chloroform. In toluene, however, the SV mechanism is less important for the RISC process of TXO-PhCz. An analysis of mode-specific nonadiabatic coupling (NAC) between T2 and T1 of TXO-PhCz and TXO-TPA suggests that the NAC values in certain normal modes of TXO-PhCz are much higher than those of TXO-TPA, and it is more pronounced with chloroform as a solvent. The findings demonstrate the role of the solvent-assisted SV mechanism toward the net RISC rate constant, which in turn maximizes the efficiency of thermally activated delayed fluorescence.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...

