Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Coulomb Explosion Imaging as a Tool to Distinguish Between Stereoisomers
Published on: August 18, 2017
Ultrafast 2DIR comparison of rotational energy transfer, isolated binary collision breakdown, and near critical
Matthew C Rotondaro1, Arkash Jain1, Shyamsunder Erramilli2
1Department of Chemistry and the Photonics Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Abstract:
The density dependence of rotational and vibrational energy relaxation (RER and VER) of the N2O ν3 asymmetric stretch in dense gas and supercritical Xe and SF6 solutions for near critical isotherms is measured by ultrafast 2DIR and infrared pump-probe spectroscopy. 2DIR analysis provides precise measurements of RER at all gas and supercritical solvent densities. An isolated binary collision (IBC) model is sufficient to describe RER for solvent densities ≤ ∼4M where rotational equilibrium is re-established in ∼1.5-2.5 collisions. N2O RER is ∼30% more efficient in SF6 than in Xe due to additional relaxation pathways in SF6 and electronic factor differences. 2DIR analysis revealed that N2O RER exhibits a critical slowing effect in SF6 at near critical density (ρ* ∼ 0.8) where the IBC model breaks down. This is attributable to the coupling of critical long-range density fluctuations to the local N2O free rotor environment. No such RER critical slowing is observed in Xe because IBC break down occurs much further from the Xe critical point. Many body interactions effectively shield N2O from these near critical Xe density fluctuations. The N2O ν3 VER density dependence in SF6 is different than that seen for RER, indicating a different coupling to the near critical environment than RER. N2O ν3 VER is only about ∼7 times slower than RER in SF6. In contrast, almost no VER decay is observed in Xe over 200 ps. This VER solvent difference is due to a vibrationally resonant energy transfer pathway in SF6 that is not possible for Xe.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied...
¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling
A broadband decoupling technique is used to simplify these complex, sometimes overlapping, signals. Broadband decoupling relies on a...
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...

