Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validating a psychiatric patient classification system.

M Eklof, W H Qu

    The Journal of Nursing Administration
    |May 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: study of errors in dosimetry.

    Radiation research·2007
    Same author

    The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks.

    Radiation research·2007
    Same author

    Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2005
    Same author

    [Increasing number of patients consider alternative and complementary medicine--a challenge for future health care].

    Lakartidningen·2002
    Same author

    [Collective ethical rules nothing for Swedish physicians. The Swedish Medical Society reluctantly accepted a codex ethicus first in 1951].

    Lakartidningen·2001
    Same author

    [The first physicians' rules are interesting documents of the time].

    Lakartidningen·2001
    Same journal

    The CNO-CFO Dyad: A Strategic Driver of Organizational Performance.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    Elements of Effective Professional Governance: An Integrative Review.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    New Nurse Well-Being: Implications for Retention, Job Satisfaction, and Patient Safety.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    Virtual Nursing Programs in Acute Care Settings: A Scoping Review of Patient, Nurse, and System-Level Outcomes.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    Occupational Fatigue and Cognitive Performance Among Front-Line Nurse Leaders: The Interplay of Personal and Work Factors.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    Enhancing Resilience and Well-Being Among Nurse Leaders: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness and Narrative Interventions.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    See all related articles

    This study validates a patient classification system for psychiatric settings. The findings offer a replicable design for administrators to ensure accurate patient categorization in forensic and general psychiatric units.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatric care
    • Healthcare administration
    • Forensic psychology

    Background:

    • Accurate patient classification systems are essential in psychiatric settings.
    • Existing systems may require validation for reliability and utility.
    • Forensic psychiatric units present unique challenges for patient classification.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe and discuss a validity study of a patient classification system.
    • To assess the applicability of the study design to various psychiatric units.
    • To provide recommendations for validating patient classification systems.

    Main Methods:

    • Conducting a validity study on four forensic psychiatric units.
    • Documenting the study design and methodology.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing the results for implications in psychiatric patient classification.

    • Main Results:

    • The study successfully validated a patient classification system in a forensic psychiatric setting.
    • The described design is adaptable for use in other psychiatric units.
    • The recommendations provide a framework for system validation.

    Conclusions:

    • Validation studies are critical for accurate psychiatric patient classification.
    • The presented methodology offers a practical approach for administrators.
    • The findings support the development of robust and reliable patient classification systems across psychiatric settings.