Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...

The Availability Heuristic

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...

Parallel Processing

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Delaying reward feedback does not increase the influence of information on attentional priority in visual search.

Cognition·2026

Same author

(Temporal) Visual Attention NOT in Crisis.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025

Same author

Modelling Pavlovian biases in depressed and healthy young adults.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2025

Same author

Generalized learning induced by training and tDCS is predicted by prefrontal cortical morphology.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025

Same author

Adolescent metacognitive ability predicts spontaneous task strategy adjustment.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025

Same author

Effects of instructed and experienced uncertainty on attentional priority.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Knowledge generalization and the costs of multitasking.

Kelly G Garner^1,2, Paul E Dux³

¹School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. getkellygarner@gmail.com.

Nature Reviews. Neuroscience

|November 8, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Multitasking limits stem from the brain's ability to generalize knowledge for new tasks. This behavioral flexibility comes at the cost of performance when doing two things simultaneously.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Area of Science:

Cognitive neuroscience
Neurobiology of learning and memory

Background:

Humans excel at novel tasks but struggle with multitasking.
Previous research focused on multitasking in isolation, overlooking links to generalization.
The relationship between multitasking costs and knowledge generalization capacity is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the link between multitasking costs and the brain's capacity for knowledge generalization.
To explore the neurophysiological underpinnings of multitasking limitations and generalization.
To explain rapid task understanding, multitasking deficits, and practice effects.

Main Methods:

Interrogation of neurophysiological circuitry.
Analysis of neural representations in frontoparietal and striatal regions.
Examination of task contingency sharing and segregation.

Main Results:

Rapid knowledge generalization may induce multitasking costs via shared task contingencies in neural representations.
Prolonged learning segregates these representations, reducing information sharing.
Segregation improves multitasking but reduces flexibility and generalization.

Conclusions:

Multitasking limitations are a trade-off for behavioral flexibility and rapid learning.
Neural mechanisms involving frontoparietal and striatal circuits explain these cognitive trade-offs.
Practice refines neural models, enhancing multitasking at the expense of generalization.