Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Between Midvastus and Standard Medial Parapatellar Approaches for Total
Angelo V Vasiliadis1,2, Vasiliki Chatziravdeli3, Dimitrios Metaxiotis1
12nd Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital of Thessaloniki "Papageorgiou", Thessaloniki, GRC.
Abstract:
Introduction The aim of this study was to determine whether the midvastus (MV) approach in patients who underwent total knee replacement (TKR) results in differences regarding peri-operative parameters, such as surgical time, blood loss, transfusion need and complications, when compared with medial parapatellar approach (MP). Methods This was a prospective randomized comparative study of patients who received primary TKR. The first group consisted of patients where the MP approach was used and the second those where the MV approach was utilized. Patient's age, body mass index (BMI), stage of osteoarthritis (OA), prosthesis design, duration of surgery, blood loss in the drainage, hemoglobin (Hb), and intra-operative complications were recorded. Results From December 2019 to June 2020 a total of 107 (22 males, 85 females) and 38 (seven males, 31 females) patients were operated on with the MP and MV approaches, respectively. The two groups did not differ in terms of age, BMI, gender and stage of OA, however, pre-operative haemoglobin (Hb) was higher in the MP group [mean 13,5 (1.3) versus 13.1 (0.73)]. There was no significant difference in Hb decline pre- and post-operatively and in drain volume between groups. The mean Hb drop was similar for the MP [-2.2 (1.08)] and MV [-2.52 (1.06)] groups, and even though the transfusion rates were lower for the MP group, it did not reach significance. The duration of surgery was significantly longer in the MV group, with a mean time of 95.6 (12.94) minutes versus 89.4 (14.28) in the MP group. Overall complications did not differ significantly among the two surgical approaches. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that pre-operative Hb [OR 2.6 95% CI (1.43, 4.75)] and approach [OR 4.15 95% CI (1.15, 14.98)] were significantly correlated with the need for transfusion when gender, BMI, redon drainage, prosthesis size and duration of surgery were considered together. Conclusion In our experience, total knee replacement performed with either the midvastus or medial parapatellar approach does not result in any advantage with regards to the intra-operative complications, drain blood volume or difference in Hb drop post-operative. However, the midvastus approach presents a longer operation time, with the risk of higher transfusion rates for the patients.
Insights
The midvastus (MV) approach for total knee replacement (TKR) showed no significant difference in blood loss or complications compared to the medial parapatellar (MP) approach. However, the MV approach resulted in longer surgical times and a potential for higher transfusion rates.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Surgical Techniques
- Patient Outcomes
Background:
- Total knee replacement (TKR) is a common procedure for end-stage knee osteoarthritis.
- Surgical approach selection can influence peri-operative outcomes.
- The midvastus (MV) and medial parapatellar (MP) approaches are utilized in TKR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare peri-operative parameters between the midvastus (MV) and medial parapatellar (MP) approaches in total knee replacement (TKR).
- To evaluate differences in surgical time, blood loss, transfusion needs, and complications.
Main Methods:
- Prospective randomized comparative study involving patients undergoing primary TKR.
- Patients were divided into two groups: MP approach and MV approach.
- Data collected included age, BMI, osteoarthritis stage, surgical duration, blood loss, hemoglobin levels, and complications.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in hemoglobin drop or drain volume between the MP and MV groups.
- The MV group experienced significantly longer surgical durations (95.6 min vs. 89.4 min).
- While transfusion rates were lower in the MP group, this difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusions:
- Neither the MV nor MP approach offers an advantage regarding intra-operative complications, blood loss, or hemoglobin drop post-operatively.
- The MV approach is associated with increased operative time and a potential for higher transfusion rates.
- Pre-operative hemoglobin levels and the surgical approach itself were significant predictors of transfusion necessity.
