Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
Published on: August 24, 2017
Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial Testing the Efficacy of fMRI Neurofeedback on Clinical and Cognitive
Sheut-Ling Lam1, Marion Criaud1, Steve Lukito1
1Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Lam, Criaud, Lukito, Westwood, Simonoff, Rubia), Department of Neuroimaging (Kowalczyk, Barker, Giampietro), and Department of Biostatistics (Agbedjro), King's College London; Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education (Criaud); Institute of Human Sciences, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, U.K. (Westwood); Department of Psychology, School of Social Science, University of Westminster, London (Westwood); Southwest London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London (Curran); South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London (Barret, Abbott); Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London (Liang); Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Technical University Dresden, Germany (Rubia).
Objective:
Functional MRI neurofeedback (fMRI-NF) could potentially be a novel, safe nonpharmacological treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial of fMRI-NF of the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC), compared to an active control condition, showed promising improvement of ADHD symptoms (albeit in both groups) and in brain function. However, comparison with a placebo condition in a larger trial is required to test efficacy.
Methods:
This double-blind, sham-controlled randomized controlled trial tested the effectiveness and efficacy of fMRI-NF of the rIFC on symptoms and executive functions in 88 boys with ADHD (44 each in the active and sham arms). To investigate treatment-related changes, groups were compared at the posttreatment and 6-month follow-up assessments, controlling for baseline scores, age, and medication status. The primary outcome measure was posttreatment score on the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS).
Results:
No significant group differences were found on the ADHD-RS. Both groups showed similar decreases in other clinical and cognitive measures, except for a significantly greater decrease in irritability and improvement in motor inhibition in sham relative to active fMRI-NF at the posttreatment assessment, covarying for baseline. There were no significant side effects or adverse events. The active relative to the sham fMRI-NF group showed enhanced activation in rIFC and other frontal and temporo-occipital-cerebellar self-regulation areas. However, there was no progressive rIFC upregulation, correlation with ADHD-RS scores, or transfer of learning.
Conclusions:
Contrary to the hypothesis, the study findings do not suggest that fMRI-NF of the rIFC is effective in improving clinical symptoms or cognition in boys with ADHD.
More Related Videos
10:02Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
Published on: March 12, 2020
10:51Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety
Published on: January 20, 2012