Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

359
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
359
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

8.4K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
8.4K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

513
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
513
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

5.2K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.2K
Principles of Disease Surveillance01:26

Principles of Disease Surveillance

168
Disease surveillance is the systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data essential to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health practice. This process integrates data dissemination to entities responsible for preventing and controlling disease, injury, and disability. Surveillance systems provide crucial information for action, helping public health authorities make informed decisions to manage and prevent outbreaks, ensure public safety, optimize...
168
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

483
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
483

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Proposed Participatory Framework for Explainable AI in mHealth: Mixed Methods Study Integrating User and Stakeholder Requirements.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

CattleNet-XAI: An explainable CNN framework for efficient cattle weight estimation.

PloS one·2025
Same author

The Usability and Feasibility of a Dietary Intake Self-Monitoring Application in a Population with Varying Literacy Levels.

Journal of personalized medicine·2024
Same author

Evaluating Large Language Models for the National Premedical Exam in India: Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard.

JMIR medical education·2024
Same author

A Mobile Application-Based Relational Agent as a Health Professional for COVID-19 Patients: Design, Approach, and Implications.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2022
Same author

Successful Aging for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Experimental Study with a Tablet App.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.2K

Design Validation of a Relational Agent by COVID-19 Patients: Mixed Methods Study.

Ashraful Islam1,2,3, Beenish Moalla Chaudhry1

  • 1School of Computing and Informatics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, United States.

JMIR Human Factors
|November 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Relational agents (RAs) can support COVID-19 patients by providing guidance and mental well-being promotion. While usability needs improvement, users found the RA helpful and acceptable as an alternative to healthcare professionals in non-emergency situations.

Keywords:
COVID-19chatbotdesign validationdesign validation surveydigital health interventionhealth carehealth care professionalhealth promotionheuristicmHealthmental well-beingrelational agentself-isolation

More Related Videos

Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR Saliva Diagnostic Strategy utilizing Open-Source Pipetting Robots
11:11

Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR Saliva Diagnostic Strategy utilizing Open-Source Pipetting Robots

Published on: February 11, 2022

4.6K
Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19
08:48

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19

Published on: February 16, 2022

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.2K
Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR Saliva Diagnostic Strategy utilizing Open-Source Pipetting Robots
11:11

Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR Saliva Diagnostic Strategy utilizing Open-Source Pipetting Robots

Published on: February 11, 2022

4.6K
Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19
08:48

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19

Published on: February 16, 2022

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Digital Health
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Background:

  • Relational agents (RAs) show promise in health interventions but are under-explored during pandemics.
  • Healthcare systems face strain during pandemics, increasing the need for novel support solutions.
  • Relational agents could alleviate pressure on healthcare professionals (HCPs) and facilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To design a prototypical RA collaboratively with COVID-19 patients and HCPs.
  • To evaluate the RA's usability, usefulness, and acceptability for pandemic-related healthcare delivery.

Main Methods:

  • Co-design of an RA with 21 COVID-19 patients and 35 HCPs.
  • RA designed for testing guidance, isolation support, emergency handling, and post-recovery well-being.
  • Usability assessed via System Usability Scale (SUS) with 98 participants.
  • Usefulness and acceptability rated using Likert scales.

Main Results:

  • The RA prototype achieved an average SUS score of 58.82.
  • 90% of participants found the RA helpful, and 69% accepted it as an alternative to HCPs.
  • Favorable feedback indicated willingness to use the RA for non-life-threatening scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Further development is recommended to enhance RA automation and emotional support capabilities.
  • Improved information provision, tracking, and specific recommendations are suggested for future iterations.
  • The RA shows potential as a supplementary tool in pandemic healthcare settings.