Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

2.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
2.0K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.3K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

266
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
266
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

190
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
190
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

60.5K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
60.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Notes on the History of In Vitro Hippocampal Electrophysiology and LTP: Personal Reflections.

Hippocampus·2025
Same author

Scientific Hypothesis-Testing Strengthens Neuroscience Research.

eNeuro·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Inducing Plasticity of Astrocytic Receptors by Manipulation of Neuronal Firing Rates
12:47

Inducing Plasticity of Astrocytic Receptors by Manipulation of Neuronal Firing Rates

Published on: March 20, 2014

14.3K

Neuroscience Needs to Test Both Statistical and Scientific Hypotheses.

Bradley E Alger1

  • 1Department of Physiology, Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 balgerlab@gmail.com.

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
|November 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is widely used in neuroscience but often misused. While estimation statistics offer benefits, they don't fully align with experimental neuroscience needs, suggesting a hybrid approach is best.

More Related Videos

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.6K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

72.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Inducing Plasticity of Astrocytic Receptors by Manipulation of Neuronal Firing Rates
12:47

Inducing Plasticity of Astrocytic Receptors by Manipulation of Neuronal Firing Rates

Published on: March 20, 2014

14.3K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.6K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

72.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Statistics in Science
  • Scientific Methodology

Background:

  • Experimental neuroscience predominantly employs null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) for result evaluation.
  • Misapplication of NHST has led to research errors and questionable practices, prompting calls for its replacement.
  • Estimation statistics, emphasizing uncertainty via metrics like confidence intervals, have been proposed as an alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the suitability of replacing NHST with estimation statistics in experimental neuroscience.
  • To explore the philosophical and practical alignment of estimation statistics with laboratory-based neuroscience.
  • To argue for retaining and improving NHST while integrating beneficial aspects of estimation statistics.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of the philosophical underpinnings and practical applications of NHST and estimation statistics.
  • Examination of the compatibility of estimation statistics' remedies (e.g., preregistration) with experimental neuroscience.
  • Discussion of how estimation statistics' strengths can complement traditional NHST.

Main Results:

  • Estimation statistics align well with clinical neuroscience, drug development, and social sciences but less so with much experimental neuroscience.
  • The philosophy of estimation statistics diverges from the needs of laboratory-based experimental neuroscience.
  • Certain estimation statistics practices, like mandatory preregistration, are incompatible with much experimental neuroscience.

Conclusions:

  • Completely replacing NHST with estimation statistics would be detrimental to experimental neuroscience.
  • Neuroscience can benefit from incorporating practical elements of estimation statistics into existing methods.
  • NHST should be retained and improved, integrating useful aspects of estimation statistics for robust scientific communication.