Short-term results of the uncemented triathlon total knee arthroplasty: a large cohort single-centre comparative...

The purpose of this study is to assess the short-term survivorship of a new uncemented TKA design in a high-volume centre to evaluate the safety of this design prior to widespread adoption.

We performed a retrospective cohort study of all primary TKAs (cemented and uncemented) between May 2018 and May 2019. Primary outcome variables included aseptic revision, all-cause revision, time to revision, operative time and radiological outcomes. Predictor variables considered included age, gender, BMI, ASA, implant type (cruciate-retaining, posterior-stabilised or totally-stabilised) and the use of cemented or uncemented implants.

There were 300 cemented TKAs and 249 uncemented TKAs (Triathlon, Stryker Inc., Mahwah, NJ) implanted. The mean follow-up for all cases was 31.6 months (minimum follow-up 2 years). Of the entire 549 implants only 4 were revised. Two of these were for infection, 1 was for patellar maltracking and 1 was for knee stiffness. All 4 revisions occurred in the cemented cohort. The aseptic revision rate in the cemented cohort was 0.7% compared to 0.0% in the uncemented cohort (p = 0.298). Operative times were significantly reduced in the uncemented cohort from 57.9 to 51.7 min (p < 0.001). There were 8/300 (2.6%) patients with RLLs in the cemented cohort and 4/249 (1.6%) patients with RLLs in the uncemented cohort (p = 0.56).

The uncemented Triathlon TKA demonstrates excellent survivorship at short-term follow-up when compared to the cemented Triathlon TKA, thus eliminating any potential clinical concerns with this novel implant in the early post-operative phase.