Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Clinical Use of a 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene-Based Sanger and/or Next Generation Sequencing Assay to Test Preoperative
Laure Flurin1,2, Joseph J Hemenway1, Cody R Fisher1
1Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Abstract:
Preoperative pathogen identification in patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is typically limited to synovial fluid culture. Whether sequencing-based approaches are of potential use in identification of pathogens in PJI, and if so which approach is ideal, is incompletely defined. The objective of the study was to analyze the accuracy of a 16S rRNA (rRNA) gene-based PCR followed by Sanger sequencing and/or targeted metagenomic sequencing approach (tMGS) performed on synovial fluid for PJI diagnosis. A retrospective study was conducted, analyzing synovial fluids tested between August 2020 and May 2021 at a single center. Subjects with hip, knee, shoulder, and elbow arthroplasties who had synovial fluid aspirated and clinically subjected to sequence-based testing and conventional culture were studied. A total of 154 subjects were included in the study; 118 had noninfectious arthroplasty failure (NIAF), while 36 had PJI. Clinical sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of PJI were 69% and 100%, respectively, for the sequencing-based approach and 72% and 100%, respectively, for conventional culture (P = 0.74). The combination of both tests was more sensitive (83%) than culture alone (P = 0.04). Results of sequencing-based testing led to changes in treatment in four of 36 (11%) PJI subjects. Microbial identification was achieved using Sanger and next generation sequencing in 19 and 6 subjects, respectively. When combined with culture, the described 16S rRNA gene sequencing-based approach increased sensitivity compared to culture alone, suggesting its potential use in the diagnosis of PJI when synovial fluid culture is negative. IMPORTANCE Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a dreadful complication of joint replacement. Noninvasive identification of infectious pathogens has been traditionnally limited to culture-based testing of synovial fluid which has poor sensitivity. Sanger and Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may be used for synovial fluid testing in PJI, but experience in routine practice is sparse. We used a targeted metagenomic sequencing approach for routine testing of synovial fluid involving NGS when Sanger sequencing had failed or was likely to fail. The objective of this study was to analyze the approach's performance for diagnosis of PJI in comparison to culture for testing synovial fluid. Overall, the sequencing-based approach was not superior to culture for diagnosis of PJI, but yielded positive results in some culture-negative samples.
Insights
Sequencing-based pathogen identification in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) shows similar accuracy to conventional culture but improves diagnosis when cultures are negative. Combining both methods enhances sensitivity for detecting PJI pathogens.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Infectious Diseases
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis relies heavily on synovial fluid culture, which has limitations in sensitivity.
- Sequencing-based methods offer potential alternatives for pathogen identification in PJI.
- Routine clinical application and comparative accuracy of these sequencing approaches remain underexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach (including Sanger and targeted metagenomic sequencing) on synovial fluid for PJI.
- To compare the performance of sequencing-based testing against conventional culture for PJI diagnosis.
- To assess the impact of sequencing results on patient treatment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of synovial fluid samples from 154 patients undergoing arthroplasty procedures between August 2020 and May 2021.
- Samples were tested using both conventional culture and a 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach (Sanger and/or targeted metagenomic sequencing).
- Clinical sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared between methods.
Main Results:
- Sequencing-based approach sensitivity was 69% and specificity 100%, comparable to conventional culture (72% sensitivity, 100% specificity).
- The combination of sequencing and culture demonstrated higher sensitivity (83%) than culture alone (P=0.04).
- Treatment regimens were altered in 11% of PJI patients based on sequencing results, and sequencing identified pathogens in culture-negative cases.
Conclusions:
- The 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach is a valuable adjunct to conventional culture for PJI diagnosis, particularly for culture-negative samples.
- While not superior to culture alone, sequencing enhances diagnostic sensitivity and can guide treatment decisions.
- Further investigation into optimizing sequencing strategies for PJI is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Ribosome Profiling
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique...
Real Time RT-PCR
The real-time quantification of the number of amplified products is...
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

