Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.8K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.8K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.5K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.5K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

60.5K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
60.5K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.2K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.2K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.7K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.7K
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

12.0K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
12.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

People with Autism Spectrum Disorder Could Interact More Easily with a Robot than with a Human: Reasons and Limits.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Étude des stratégies de raisonnement causal dans l'estimation de la probabilité diagnostique à travers un paradigme expérimental de production de règle.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2017
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Combining Behavior and EEG to Study the Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Episodic Memory
08:16

Combining Behavior and EEG to Study the Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Episodic Memory

Published on: May 11, 2020

7.6K

Reducing Choice-Blindness? An Experimental Study Comparing Experienced Meditators to Non-Meditators.

Léa Lachaud1,2, Baptiste Jacquet1,3, Jean Baratgin1,3

  • 1CHArt RNSR 200515259U, Université Paris 8, 93200 Saint-Denis, France.

European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
|November 10, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Experienced mindfulness meditation practitioners are better at detecting choice-blindness manipulations than novices. This suggests meditation practice enhances awareness, not just inherent mindfulness traits.

Keywords:
choice-blindnessdecision-makingexperienced meditatorsmeditation effectsmindfulness

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring Dynamic Neural Changes Associated with Religious Chanting
05:05

Author Spotlight: Exploring Dynamic Neural Changes Associated with Religious Chanting

Published on: May 31, 2024

1.1K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Combining Behavior and EEG to Study the Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Episodic Memory
08:16

Combining Behavior and EEG to Study the Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Episodic Memory

Published on: May 11, 2020

7.6K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Dynamic Neural Changes Associated with Religious Chanting
05:05

Author Spotlight: Exploring Dynamic Neural Changes Associated with Religious Chanting

Published on: May 31, 2024

1.1K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Mindfulness Research

Background:

  • Mindfulness involves present-moment awareness and has been linked to enhanced situational awareness.
  • Choice-blindness describes the failure to notice discrepancies between intentions and decision outcomes.
  • Understanding factors influencing choice-blindness detection is crucial for cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether mindfulness meditation practice influences the detection of choice-blindness.
  • To compare the choice-blindness detection rates between experienced mindfulness meditators and a control group.

Main Methods:

  • An online experimental design was used with 15 image-choice decisions.
  • Participants' choices were surreptitiously manipulated to create discrepancies.
  • Performance was assessed by the likelihood of detecting these manipulations.

Main Results:

  • The group experienced in mindfulness meditation demonstrated a higher likelihood of detecting manipulations compared to the control group.
  • This effect was attributed to the practice of mindfulness meditation itself, not necessarily the mindfulness trait (FMI scores).

Conclusions:

  • Mindfulness meditation practice enhances the ability to detect choice-blindness.
  • Improved introspective access and reasoning control, developed through meditation, likely explain this enhanced detection ability.