Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

14:58
Comprehensive Endovascular and Open Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
Published on: October 20, 2017
9.8K
Volume staging for arteriovenous malformation SRS treatment using VMAT
Claudia Mendez1,2, Ermias Gete3
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|November 10, 2022
Summary
Volume-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (VS-SRS) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is feasible on a linear accelerator. This technique achieves dose coverage comparable to Gamma Knife, with minimal added uncertainty from multiple setups.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Neurosurgery
Background:
- Volume staging (VS) divides large targets into smaller segments for radiation treatment.
- Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivers high-dose radiation to small targets with steep dose falloff.
- Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is an advanced radiation delivery technique.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the feasibility of volume-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (VS-SRS) using VMAT on a linear accelerator.
- To compare VMAT-based VS-SRS plans with Gamma Knife (GK) VS-SRS plans.
- To evaluate the impact of planning target volume (PTV) margins on normal brain (NB) dose.
Main Methods:
- Ten patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) previously treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy were selected.
- VS-SRS plans were created using VMAT on a TrueBeam STx linear accelerator with two target divisions (AVM and PTV).
- Plans were compared to literature GK VS-SRS data, and end-to-end testing with film dosimetry was performed.
Main Results:
- VMAT-based VS-SRS plans achieved median target dose coverage of 97.5% and conformity index of 0.8.
- The average normal brain V12Gy increased by 48.9% with a 1 mm PTV margin compared to the AVM target alone.
- Point-dose measurements showed excellent agreement (-0.6%) with treatment planning system calculations; gamma analysis passing rates exceeded 90%.
Conclusions:
- VMAT is capable of producing VS-SRS plans with dose falloff characteristics similar to Gamma Knife.
- Normal brain dose is significantly influenced by the planning target volume margin size.
- Two-stage treatment setups for VS-SRS do not appear to introduce additional uncertainty in treatment delivery.

