Mitigating consequence insensitivity for genetically engineered crops

Area of Science:

• Social Psychology
• Agricultural Science
• Public Opinion Research

Background:

• Public perception of genetically engineered (GE) food is often polarized.
• A significant challenge arises when individuals disregard evidence, focusing solely on pre-existing beliefs.
• Understanding the basis of these beliefs is crucial for informed policy and scientific communication.

Purpose of the Study:

• To investigate consequence-insensitive beliefs regarding GE crops in a large German sample.
• To examine the prevalence of these beliefs among both GE supporters and opponents.
• To assess the potential for mitigating consequence-insensitive attitudes.

Main Methods:

• Survey administered to a demographically representative sample of 3,025 German adults.
• Assessment of beliefs about GE crops, specifically focusing on disregard for risks and benefits.
• Follow-up probes to evaluate the flexibility of stated beliefs.

Main Results:

• A large majority of GE opponents and a notable minority of supporters exhibited consequence-insensitive beliefs.
• Participants frequently expressed views that were inconsistent with absolute prohibition or permission of GE crops.
• Stated consequence insensitivity did not necessarily translate to rigid policy stances.

Conclusions:

• Consequence-insensitive beliefs about GE crops are prevalent, particularly among opponents.
• These beliefs may represent strong moral convictions rather than fixed policy endorsements.
• Findings suggest a need for nuanced communication strategies that acknowledge underlying values.