One-Bond 13C-1H and 13C-13C Spin-Coupling Constants as Constraints in MA'AT Analysis of Saccharide Conformation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Atomic Scale Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies by Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Published on: September 17, 2017
Timothy Tetrault, Reagan J Meredith, Wenhui Zhang1
1Omicron Biochemicals, Inc., South Bend, Indiana 46617, United States.
Abstract:
MA'AT analysis uses ensembles of redundant experimental NMR spin-coupling constants, parametrized J-coupling equations obtained from density functional theory (DFT) calculations, and circular statistics to produce probability distributions of molecular torsion angles in solution and information on librational motions about these angles (Meredith et al., J. Chem. Info. Model. 2022, 62, 3135-3141). Current DFT methods give nearly quantitative two- and three-bond JHH, JCH, and 1JCC values for use in MA'AT analysis of saccharides. In contrast, the accuracy of DFT-calculated one-bond 1JCH and 1JCC values is more difficult to determine, preventing their use in MA'AT modeling. This report describes experimental and computational studies that address this problem using two approaches (Strategies 1 and 2). Differences [1JCHcalc - 1JCHexp] (Strategy 1) ranged from -1.2 to 2.5 Hz, giving an average difference of 0.8 ± 1.7 Hz. Percent differences ranged from -0.8% to 1.6%, giving an average % difference of 0.5 ± 1.1%. In comparison, [1JCH - 1JCHexp] (Strategy 2) ranged from -1.8 to 0.2 Hz, giving an average difference of -1.2 ± 0.7 Hz. Percent differences ranged from -1.2% to 0.1%, giving an average % difference of -0.8 ± 0.5%. Strategy 1 gave an average difference of 2.1 Hz between calculated and experimental 1JCC values, with an average % difference of 5.1 ± 0.2%. Calculated 1JCC values were consistently larger than experimental values. Strategy 2 also gave calculated 1JCC values that were larger than the experimental values, with an average difference of 2.3 ± 0.6 Hz, and an average % difference of 5.6 ± 1.6%. The findings of both strategies are similar and indicate that 1JCH values in saccharides can be calculated nearly quantitatively, but 1JCC values appear to be consistently overestimated by ∼5% using current DFT methods.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling
A broadband decoupling technique is used to simplify these complex, sometimes overlapping, signals. Broadband decoupling relies on a...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
¹H NMR of Conformationally Flexible Molecules: Temporal Resolution
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...

