Long-term outcomes in nonprogressors to cardiac resynchronization therapy
John Rickard1, Michael R Gold2, Divyang Patel1
1Cleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Insights
Patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) who show minimal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement, termed nonprogressors, have better mid-term outcomes but similar long-term survival compared to progressors.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is used for heart failure patients.
- Patients with minimal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) change are now classified as nonprogressors.
- Long-term outcomes for nonprogressors after CRT are not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate patient outcomes after CRT based on echocardiographically determined response status.
- To compare survival free of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and heart transplantation across different CRT response groups.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 1058 patients with LVEF ≤35% and QRS duration ≥120 ms undergoing CRT.
- Response classification: super-responders (LVEF change ≥20%), responders (6%-19%), nonprogressors (0%-5%), and progressors (<0%).
- Comparison of survival free of LVAD and heart transplant at mid-term (4 years) and long-term (mean 8.7 years).
Main Results:
- Super-responders had the best outcomes, while progressors had the worst (P < .001).
- Nonprogressors showed superior mid-term outcomes compared to progressors (P = .02).
- No significant long-term survival difference was observed between nonprogressors and progressors (P = .18).
Conclusions:
- Nonprogressors to CRT exhibit superior medium-term outcomes.
- Long-term outcomes for nonprogressors are similar to progressors.
- Outcomes for nonprogressors are inferior to responders and super-responders.
Background:
Among patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), patients with a minimal change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have recently been defined as "nonprogressors" rather than as "nonresponders." Little is known regarding long-term outcomes of nonprogressors.
Objective:
We sought to evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing CRT on the basis of echocardiographically determined response status.
Methods:
We reviewed the medical charts of patients with an LVEF of ≤35% and a QRS duration of ≥120 ms undergoing CRT at the Cleveland Clinic, Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center between 2003 and 2014. Response to CRT was defined on the basis of LVEF change as follows: super-responders ≥20%, responders 6%-19%, nonprogressors 0%-5%, and progressors <0%. Survival free of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and heart transplantation was compared on the basis of response classification.
Results:
A total of 1058 patients were included and had a mean follow-up 8.7 ± 5.4 years, over which time there were 606 end points (37 LVAD implants, 32 heart transplants, and 537 deaths). Survival free of LVAD and heart transplant differed significantly between response groups after CRT both in the mid-term (4 years) and in the long-term (8.7 ± 5.4 years), with super-responders achieving the best outcomes and progressors the worst (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, nonprogressors had superior outcomes to progressors (P = .02) at 4 years of follow-up. Over the duration of follow-up (8.7 ± 5.4 years), there was no significant difference in survival between those 2 groups (P = .18).
Conclusion:
Nonprogressors to CRT have superior medium-term outcomes but similar long-term outcomes to progressors and inferior outcomes to responders and super-responders.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation


