Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Inducement and Evaluation of a Murine Model of Experimental Myopia
Published on: January 22, 2019
Clinical Validation of a New Optical Biometer for Myopia Control in a Healthy Pediatric Population
Elena Martínez-Plaza1,2, Ainhoa Molina-Martín1, Alfonso Arias-Puente3
1Group of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.
Insights
The Myah device demonstrates high repeatability for pediatric biometric measurements, including corneal radius and axial length. It shows good agreement with the Myopia Master, supporting its clinical use in children.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Pediatric Optometry
Background:
- Accurate biometric measurements are crucial for pediatric eye care and myopia management.
- The Myah device is a new tool for ocular biometry, requiring validation in pediatric populations.
- Assessing device repeatability and agreement with established systems is essential for clinical adoption.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical validation of the Myah device in children.
- To assess the repeatability of corneal radius (K1, K2), white-to-white distance (WTW), and axial length (AL) measurements using the Myah device.
- To analyze the agreement between the Myah device and the Myopia Master system for these biometric parameters.
Main Methods:
- Fifty-one children (51 eyes) underwent repeated measurements with the Myah device.
- Parameters measured included flat (K1) and steep (K2) corneal radius, white-to-white (WTW) distance, and axial length (AL).
- Agreement analysis involved comparing Myah measurements with the Myopia Master system in a subgroup of 30 eyes using Bland-Altman plots and paired t-tests.
Main Results:
- The Myah device exhibited high repeatability, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ≥ 0.971 for all parameters.
- Repeatability (Sw) values were 0.018 D (K1), 0.021 D (K2), 0.071 mm (WTW), and 0.017 mm (AL).
- Good agreement was found for K1 (p=0.16) and AL (p=0.009), with some statistically significant differences noted for K2 (p<0.001) and WTW (p<0.001) between devices, though clinically acceptable.
Conclusions:
- The Myah device provides consistent and repeatable biometric measurements in a healthy pediatric population.
- Its measurements of corneal radius, WTW distance, and AL are validated for clinical use in children.
- The Myah device can be used interchangeably with the Myopia Master, with minor considerations for K2 and WTW measurements.
Abstract:
To assess the clinical validation of the Myah device in a pediatric population by evaluating the repeatability of biometric evaluations and analyzing its agreement with the Myopia Master system. A total of 51 children (51 eyes) were enrolled. Repeated measurements of flat (K1) and steep (K2) corneal radius, white-to-white (WTW) distance and axial length (AL) were performed with the Myah device. The same parameters were obtained from a subgroup (30 eyes) with the Myopia Master for the agreement analysis. The repeatability was assessed using the intrasubject standard deviation (Sw) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement was analyzed using the Bland−Altman method and the paired Student t-test. The Sw was 0.018 D, 0.021 D, 0.071 mm and 0.017 mm for K1, K2, WTW and AL, respectively (ICC ≥ 0.971). The mean difference and limits of agreement when comparing instruments were −0.013 (−0.102/0.077) for K1 (p = 0.16), −0.058 (−0.127/0.012) for K2 (p < 0.001), 0.151 (−0.370/0.673) for WTW (p < 0.001) and 0.030 (−0.091/0.151) for AL (p = 0.009). In conclusion, the Myah device provides consistent measurements of corneal radius, WTW distance and AL in a healthy pediatric population, validating their usefulness in clinical practice. These measurements could be used interchangeably with those provided by the Myopia Master device, although with some caution.
More Related Videos
05:26Author Spotlight: Exploring Press Needle Efficacy and Underlying Molecular Pathways
Published on: April 12, 2024
06:19Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
Published on: September 27, 2024