Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

40.5K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.5K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.4K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.4K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

28.0K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
28.0K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

90.6K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.6K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

23.4K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The role of self-compassion and compassion toward others in burnout syndrome in a sample of medical students.

PsyCh journal·2023
Same author

[Individual and group factors that impact the exchange of information among intervention programs: a structural view].

Cadernos de saude publica·2021
Same author

Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers?

Journal of community psychology·2021
Same author

Examining the effect of the individual characteristics of implementers and the interaction of multiple relationships on the structure of psychosocial intervention teams.

Implementation science : IS·2020
Same author

Sense of community, psychological empowerment, and relational structure at the individual and organizational levels: Evidence from a multicase study.

Journal of community psychology·2019
Same author

Underlying Dimensions of Social Cohesion in a Rural Community Affected by Wartime Violence in Colombia.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2019
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 22, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K

Structural Cohesion, Role Equivalence, or Homophily: Which Process Best Explains Social Homogeneity?

Ignacio Ramos-Vidal1,2

  • 1Department of Social Psychology, University of Seville, 41018 Sevilla, Spain.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
|November 11, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Role equivalence best explains social homogeneity among psychosocial professionals. This relational mechanism, focusing on similar network positions, was more influential than structural cohesion or homophily in a Colombian study.

Keywords:
heterophilyhomophilypsychosocial interventionrole equivalencesense of communitysocial homogeneitysocial network analysisstructural cohesion

More Related Videos

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

13.8K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

13.8K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Network Analysis
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Social homogeneity, the similarity in perceptions and attitudes, is shaped by an individual's relational context.
  • The specific relational mechanism driving social homogeneity remains debated in social network analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine which of three network analysis mechanisms—structural cohesion, role equivalence, or homophily—most significantly explains social homogeneity.
  • To investigate the primary driver of shared perceptions and attitudes within a professional network.

Main Methods:

  • Network analysis techniques were applied to data from 110 psychosocial professionals in Northwest Colombia.
  • Structural cohesion was assessed via core-periphery analysis, role equivalence through degree centrality, and homophily by professional profile.
  • Non-parametric statistical tests were employed to compare the influence of each mechanism.

Main Results:

  • Role equivalence emerged as the most significant predictor of social homogeneity among the studied psychosocial interveners.
  • The similarity of professional roles and network positions strongly correlated with shared perceptions and attitudes.
  • Structural cohesion and homophily demonstrated less explanatory power for social homogeneity in this sample.

Conclusions:

  • Role equivalence is the most influential relational mechanism in fostering social homogeneity within professional networks.
  • Understanding network structures, particularly role equivalence, is crucial for interventions aiming to enhance shared perspectives in professional groups.
  • Findings highlight the importance of network position in shaping social homogeneity in psychosocial care programs.